Its shocking how strong the HW division is in the UK

Can we cut out the boxing chat. As a lad born and raised in Trelawney, I need to know. I used to think I was English before this thread on a boxing forum. Can we get back on topic as my parents were probably looking forward to the queens upcoming birthday celebrations...

 

I'm stalking u by.... by adding posts to this thread like everyone else is doing? grow up. everyone else isn't stalking you too by making tread contributions. A bit sly that post- like a whhore crying raype.

I am merely posting in this thread along with many others - and actually indirectly defending your case - Britain has at least 2/3rds of the HW title pie.

U really need to move on from your sulk.

 

The HW division is buzzing at the moment. It's come back to life with some great characters and there's some intriguing matches that will hopefully be made. It excites me.

The Tyson-Wlad rematch intrigues me. That's quite hard for me to predict.

I'm glad Haye's back, and I want him to step up his competition now, with hopefully another 2-3 fights before the end of the year.

Anthony Joshua is an exciting prospect and I'm eagerly awaiting his next fight. I can't agree that he's the 3rd best HW though. Not yet.

 

Im thinking the UK will probably dominate HW boxing for the next 10 years. Enjoy this golden British HW decade lads, you will be able to tell your kids about it later.

 

The 'terrible post' you failed to respond to after reading it when the thread was up? All I wrote was the truth. So sorry the truth offends you. I guess your response would have been worthless if you find the truth to be a 'terrible post'. Funny how you're responding to a Hamed post on a UK heavyweight thread instead of the actual Hamed thread where the truth about Hamed was there for all to see.

 

Gloves Are Off Joshua vs Breazeale
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9JYwFjU8-k

 

Interesting. Excuses for not responding. The apology was tongue in cheek. I've no idea why it was delected. So just what did I write that was 'different to the truth?'

 

Something silly? On your part. You wrote that you would take the Hamed that beat Robinson, Johnson and Belcastro over MAB, because he 'boxed more then'. I wrote that Robinson was something like 21 9, Johnson was 33 years old and Belcastro was never anything special anyway, when Hamed beat them-hardly on MABs level. Lufcrazy wrote that Hamed was never as technically astute as MAB, which couldn't be more correct, and that he had seen all of Hamed's fights. I would happen to say that those written by Luf and myself are all correct statements.

 

hamed was too arrogant to think laterally in order to beat MAB.