Which of the following would beat Tubbs at his best?

So much wrong here.

Loughran does use his jab to keep Walker at the end of his punches. He wouldn't be landing so many jabs coming in and out if that weren't the case.

You say only smaller boxers today jab coming forward? And that a taller fighter would get "cursed out" for coming into the smaller mans range? You just said that in the post I quoted.

Did you curse Paul Williams out?
https://streamable.com/daed

He was literally the first person I searched, and I went to a random point in the fight, and immediately doing what you condone.

The strange thing is how every time you use an example we can actually observe, you always seem to be wrong

 

"Biggest" implies more than one.

I see him throwing jabs from the outside. That's exactly what I said his strategy would be, like it was against Bowe.

I do not see him throwing combinations from the outside successfully. Attempting so is handing an opportunity to Walker to take the W.

 

http://www.picgifs.com/reaction-gifs/reaction-gifs/wtf/wtf083.gif

You are using the exact same argument to explain Ali's success that Janitor and I are using to explain Corbetts.

 

You might be interested to learn a bit about Loughran.

He was an unorthodox boxer, who proved himself by far the best technician, in an era populated with orthodox boxers.

He saw the subtle merits in fighters who orthodox boxers often deride, such as Rocky Marciano and Hurricane Jackson.

He was a consummate student of boxing technique, and was always looking for something new.

He basically considered himself above the boxing textbook.

He couldn’t break an egg, but if a puncher was getting results against him he would slug it out, and he would make it work!

He might actually have been the most successful 175 champion of all time.

 

"Boxers couldn't throw 1-2's"
Wrong

"Boxers couldn't double the jab"
Wrong

"Modern boxers do not come forward if they are bigger"
Wrong

"They never threw combinations"
Wrong


"Theres no way smaller fighters could overcome physical differences"
*Checks Loughrans Boxrec, and watches his fight with Carnera*
Wrong


At some point we can't do all the work for you.

 

What exactly are we up against here?

John Ruiz and Sam Peter in the not too distant past.

Charles Martin more recently?

These are the paragons of boxing technique who apparently put these guys in the shade?

 

Damn, you're really starting to unravel here.

So Paul Williams, with all his modern resources, couldn't figure out how to fix a flaw that you say plagued an antiquated Loughran, and other old school boxers?

But...yet...he was a world champion? Who beat
Margarito
Wright
Ishida
Lara



So you're saying Modern boxers can have tons of success being very fundamentally flawed and/or unorthodox?

 

Not too many fights from that era were actually filmed of course, so it is pure speculation either way.

The fact that all these guys looked better in sparring sessions, when they were in their 50s, ought to tell you that the footage of the era is not telling you everything!

 

So modern boxers are light years ahead in technique, except when they're not.