Floyd @ 130 knocks out Pac/Barrera/Morales/Marquez

Okay whatever you say if that helps you sleep better at night so be it. But the last time I checked pbf was 49-0 but then again you're delusional.

 

Morales is God. You mad PBF is known as a chicken? LOL 47-1-1.

 

Morales is a disgraced cheat who couldn't carry pbfs spit bucket.

Sent from my SM-G925T using Tapatalk

 

Very true

 

Really, I thought PBF stopped Jesus Chavez in the tenth round, stopped Genaro Hernandez in the 8th, and shut out Carlos Hernandez

 

Hard to argue with this post. Maybe an decent pac fan can give it a crack

 

Pacquiao was not one dimensional. That's a cop out for lazy and misinformed fans who do not have the ability or desire to ****yze.

If he was one dimensional he would walk straight in and have a predictable and easily telegraphed attack. He does not do that. He had (in his prime, which is important to remember) tremendous head movement and tremendous angles.

If you watch the Cotto, Hatton, Marquez I and Barrera I fights you will notice that Pacquiao can generate power from all angles. And he had astonishing head movement. He was supremely well conditioned and could keep up his lateral movement and head movement up as well as power and speed up for 12 rounds.

Boxing at it's core is about punching and hurting another man. That's the essence of professional boxing. Pacquiao mastered the art of landing punches from angles (hard ones at that) you don't see or from places you don't expect them to come from. If a fan thinks that is one dimensional then they're showing a clear misunderstanding of Pacquiao's unpredictable and versatile attack.

 

I see prime Pacquiao as being too reliant on his left hand.

He also has a habit of dropping his left after throwing his right.

He couldn't cut off the ring to save his life.

He constantly leaves himself off-balance when he punches.

 

Of course he has flaws. All fighters do. But he was not a one dimensional fighter like some say he was.

 

No..at its core its hitting the other man and not getting hit in return.

 

So Pernell won the Oscar fight then?


This isn't amateur boxing.

Pacquiao used angles, head movement and speed to hit people really damn hard.

 

The judges didnt give it to him. I scored that fight for pea though.

Plus nobody was getting hurt in that fight.

Some fighters dont punch hard and it doesnt matter. Landing is what counts. Cant penalize someone for not having pop.

 

Of course you should. Sack up and stop hitting like a little girl. It's professional boxing. It's combat.

 

Boxing has always been about hitting and not getting hit. You would know that if you had been following boxing for longer than a year.

 

No it is not. If it was judges would simply count punches landed and then award the fight to the man who landed more.

But guess what? They don't do that. So there is a serious flaw in your thinking.