Rid**** Bowe: How strong was his resume

He was a better fighter than his resume shows. But, his resume was somewhat disappointing. That being said, it is light years better than any of the paper champs of the last 10 plus years.

 

By all standards, R. Bowe's resume is very good. He was never stopped and was only beaten by an ATG who he beat twice. Ad to that a fairly decent list of respectable veterans, prospects, fringe contenders and some of the usual suspects, and I think it's pretty solid.. I voted above average. I think his credentials eclipse those of Schmeling's, Walcott's, Charles, M. Spinks, L. Spinks, Patterson and Johanson. He falls short of the super greats like like Ali, Louis, Holmes, Lewis, Marciano, Foreman, etc..

 

That's how I see it, too :good

 

This totally glosses over the two Golota fights. Yes, he technically didn't lose but all intents and purposes he did so.

That said, two wins over Holyfield are very impressive.

The Tubbs win during his development is a good name win.

 

Take away Holyfield and it's meh.

Let's go for above-average.

 

Patterson was relevant for like 15 years though.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Out of the lineal champions, the following have a better resume than Bowe: Louis, Marciano, Ali, Frazier, Foreman, Holmes, Tyson, Holyfield, Lewis and Wladimir Klitschko.

 

Why would you take away Holyfield?:huh

 

Does Wladimir Klitschko have a better resume than Joe Frazier:think

 

Above average

 

Yeah.

 

Is Zsolt Erdei greater than Mike Spinks?

Is Sven Ottke greater than Carl Froch?

 

I don't share your opinion on the quality of heavyweights during the Klitschko reign.

Frazier has the best win among them (by far) but Wlads scalps occupy the next 3 spots at least, and he has Frazier outgunned in terms of quantity and dominance.

 

But you cant ignore that he had a much better single win,plus he did clean the available oposition,no way wlad had better resume than frazier