What's worse: Canelo-Khan or Golovkin Brook?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by devon2, Jul 8, 2016.


  1. GGGunbeatable

    GGGunbeatable Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,960
    8,406
    Feb 14, 2014
    Ward couldn't even make 168 against Smith, which is why they fought at 172. He had the possibility to fight GGG since 2012 but rather commentated his fights and fought Edwin Rodriguez.

    Lara has never showed any interest at all. He only uses GGG's name to push himself. Brooks showed how it is done. Actually contacting GGG's team, which Lara has never done before.

    Trout? Come on .. I would beat Trout. (Sure, because of the weight difference but you know what I mean, skillwise. Trout is not relevant anymore).

    Canelo at 155 was a huge bluff and a disgrace to the history of the MW division.
     
  2. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,671
    6,019
    May 2, 2015
    Hard to decide, pretty even.
     
  3. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,896
    2,150
    Feb 8, 2008
    :good
     
  4. Jeremy Kyle

    Jeremy Kyle Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,210
    1,351
    Jun 12, 2015
    My boy brook gona know the **** outa ggg you nom sayin?
     
  5. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,874
    Apr 30, 2006
    Canelo is also the biggest draw in the sport right now.

    I firmly remember the same guys gloating about how Khan-Canelo was a great troll move to GGG because GGG didn't deserve a Canelo fight in their eyes.

    They've already acknowledged that Alvarez had more matchmaking clout than "97k doe!!" GGG does. They've bragged about it. :lol:

    So why change the script now and act like GGG has the same matchmaking power and is the same economic draw Canelo is? Alvarez had his choice of any top middleweight or junior middleweight. GGG doesn't.

    That's what makes Khan-Canelo worse, above and beyond that Brook beating Porter eclipsed anything Amir did at 147 and is the naturally larger fighter.
     
  6. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016

    If Khan and Brook fought at 147, you would pick.....to win?
     
  7. Kahuna

    Kahuna Active Member Full Member

    928
    107
    May 22, 2014
    Lol cant wait for the excuses when Brook wins. If you know the game then you know how good Brook is. Honestly, this is a hugely competitive fight and Brook has a massive chance.
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,542
    18,228
    Oct 7, 2006
    Based on what I've seen Khan has the better resume.

    I would have to go give Khan the edge, but obviously anyone has a puncher's chance against Khan.
     
  9. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    GG bringing up an unproven kellz 13 pounds is s disgrace
     
  10. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,393
    5,505
    Aug 10, 2015
    Except Golovkin didn't duck his mando before fighting Brook... Alvarez did before fighting Khan. Alvarez had options, Golovkin didn't.
     
  11. Darni187

    Darni187 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,246
    622
    Nov 13, 2008
    Pretty even, Khan naturally a bit smaller than Brook but had a skill and speed advantage over Canelo.. But Canelo was just too big and powerful..

    Brook will have nothing over GGG, Brook will be even slower at 160.. This fight wont go past 3 or 4 rounds..
     
  12. devon2

    devon2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    105
    Jun 30, 2013
    Kell brook is unproven?????
     
  13. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,352
    Mar 11, 2016
    I didn't say resume. Resume's don't fight each other.

    So you think Khan beats Brook? that's all you had to say. :hi:
     
  14. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,671
    6,019
    May 2, 2015
    Actually, Brook is more proven at 147 than Khan but that doesn't mean ****.
     
  15. Elvizzz

    Elvizzz Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,035
    550
    Jun 29, 2008
    Floyd - pac was a joke too... Floyd much bigger..