If was either Kell Brook, or NO fight at all. Which would you prefer?

Look here. This is really ****ing simple. Golovkin has a date, venue, everything sorted. Eubank Snr displayed once again that his delusion knows no bounds. Brook (who is at least 160 entering the ring) steps in.

If K2 refuse, they have to start again from scratch looking for someone who hasn't misplaced their knob and bollox, knowing perfectly well what a rare breed that is.

As it is, with the Brook fight, he can fight 3 times this year, otherwise he can't.

Brook stating he's a huge welter is absolutely true and a world away from Khan's charlatan **** about being better at 155.

If you want irrefutably avoided fighters to be active, you'll have to make do with some less than ideal match ups.

And if you want to *****, there's a list of people at whom to direct your ire, you know exactly who they are.

:hi:

 

I'll watch it... Brook will get f*cked up.
Cat vs. A Pit Bull style.

But let's not act like this will be competitive.

 

This is like asking, Usyk vs Degale or Zurdo or no fight at all. Obviously we will tune in to watch this circus act, but it doesnt make it less of a ****ty fight, and disgrace.

 

Make GGG vs Andy Lee or Groves on september and let Brook fight a MW gatekeeper on the same card. Then GGG vs Brook on december would look less ridicuolus.

 

That would be nice, but you make it sound so simple. Maybe it would be if Groves or Lee were with Hearn, but they aren't, so all that time goes to waste, negotiations begin again elsewhere, date gets moved back etc.

After spending months negotiating with various people only for them to withdraw, at some point you just have to say **** it.

 

Actual difference between Usyk and those 2 is at least 25lb. Difference between GGG and Brook 10 maximum.

 

What are you basing those numbers off? Do you have Zurdo/Degales and Usyk's weight to back those numbers up, or are you just talking out of your ass?
This is an absolute fking disgrace, and a circus act. What kind of coward brings up a welterweight 2 whole divisions without even a catchweight. If little g is such a small MW, and the size isn't a huge difference like you little g fan girls aret rying to claim, why not fight at 154 or 155?

 

Is it easier to gain weight or lose weight? Triple G is already slim as it is.

 

Finally someone who understands

 

LMFAO what kind of excuse is that. Ward should try and drag little g up to 175, it's "easier to gain weight" right? Funny how Crawford who did not even drag Gamboa up 2 weight classes, and was fighting a guy who was campaigning at 135 already and wasn't in there just to cash out gets no credit from you little g fan girls, but you little g fan girls of course defend this absolute joke of a fight that's 10x worse than Crawford/Gamboa.

 

Consider the difference between SMW and cruiser is 32lb and work backwards from there you dumb ****.

I was actually being very conservative in my estimate to avoid spastic replies like yours.

 

We're talking about after they rehydrate right? Just like how you're basing the difference of Brook/GGG being "10 pounds", though you are incorrect on that matter too. Zurdo is a huge SMW, the kid really should be a LHW.

What you were doing was trying to excuse this absolute joke of a fight. The fact that you try and defend this is actually quite comical, you're either a huge troll, or literally re****ed. Seriously LOL @ the re**** logic of would you rather see no fight or a fight against someone that's pulled up 2 weight classes with no catchweight.

 

I would respect Golovkin more if he didn't fight a welterweight even if that meant waiting longer before he fights again.

 

You sound like a mentally deranged spastic. You take this way too seriously :-( I never slammed Crawford for fighting Gamboa by the way.

 

All he had to do was fight Brook at 154. Pulling up a WW 2 divisions without even a tune-up to see how they fit in that division is a pure coward move