If Walcott was moved at Jeffries pace, he'd lose a higher percentage of his fights, and might have been retired by his 20th fight. Jeffries fought top competition pretty much right out of the gate. He never lost until a comeback 6 years removed from the ring. His ascension to the top is as fast or faster than anyone's, and there is a legitimate debate as to how many boxing matches he had. It's likely more than what is recorded, and this is going on reported KO's alone where the fight reports have not been tracked down. Most historians who lived from 1890's to 1950's view Jeffries competition ( Fitzsimmons and Corbett ) as better than Walcott and just about all of them say Jeffries was better. They were there. You were not.
Walcott turned pro at16! His resume includes: Louis x2 Charles x4 Marciano x2 Fox Oma Layne Murray Bivins Maximx3 Tandberg Johnson Gomez Ray x2 Baksi Jeffries turned pro at 20. His early opponents include: Long .7 fights 1 win Lorraine .1 fight Baker. an overstuffed middleweight conceding36lbs Choynski .conceding a whopping 52lbs! Goddard .40 years old! Jackson .37 years old,alcoholic ,consumptive, and hadn't fought in 3 years. Jeffries best names are : Fitzsimmons 36 years old been retired for 2years out weighed by 39lbs! Fitzsimmons 38 years old outweighed by47lbs! Corbett 33 years old outweighed by 30lbs.Hadn't won a fight in 6 years! Corbett 36 years old been retired for 3 years outweighed by 27lbs,won one of last 3 fights. Ruhlin .Had been half killed by Fitzsimmons a year earlier. Sharkey 5'8" tall conceding about30lbs Sharkey " " conceding 32lbs Apart from his crucifixion at the hands of a rampant Johnson, the one man of any quality who is on his resume and resembles what we would call a heavyweight is Gus Ruhlin and he had been destroyed by Fitzsimmons a year earlier. Are you seriously suggesting that those old ,small, coming out of retirement ,versions of Fitzsimmons and Corbett that Jeffries faced are superior to the versions of Charles,Louis,Marciano, that Walcott fought? Please show a verifed source from a respected historian that states Jeffries competition is better than Walcott's.
Don't forget fighting Elmer (Violent) Ray twice and the streaking Joe Baksi. Walcott's resume is far more impressive and diverse than anything Jeff ever saw.
You really are dense. I can list a dozen that Rate Fitzsimmons or Corbett higher than Walcott. It seems when you're backed into a wall, you ask to produce soemthing. When I have it and post it here, you lose for the 199th time and simply reload. You are beginning to bore me. Like I said you say prove it like the amateur you are and just hope it's either not on the web or me don't have it. You are very weak. Just a few lists from people who rate Jeffries Competition above Wlacott. It's rare to find Walcott in the top 20. Dumb Dan Morgan (circa 1950) Fight manager, trainer Quoted in: The Encyclopedia of World Boxing Champions, John D. McCallum (pp. 46-47) 1-Jim Jeffries 2-John L. Sullivan 3-Jack Johnson 4-Bob Fitzsimmons 5-Jim Corbett 6-Gene Tunney 7-Jack Dempsey 8-Joe Louis Nat Fleischer (1958) Publisher, sportswriter, author Quoted in: The 1986-1987 Ring Record Book and Boxing Encyclopedia, edited by Herbert G. Goldman (p. 1070) 1-Jack Johnson 2-Jim Jeffries 3-Bob Fitzsimmons 4-Jack Dempsey 5-Jim Corbett 6-Joe Louis 7-Sam Langford 8-Gene Tunney 9-Max Schmeling 10-Rocky Marciano Harry Grayson (circa mid-1960s?) NEA Sports Editor-Columnist in Detroit 1-Jack Dempsey 2-Jack Johnson 3-Jim Jeffries 4-John L. Sullivan 5-Gene Tunney 6-Bob Fitzsimmons 7-Jim Corbett 8-Joe Louis The Ring Editors (Nat Loubet, Editor-n-Chief) (1975) The Ring (March 1975, pp. 28-30) 1-Joe Louis 2-Jack Dempsey 3-Jim Jeffries 4-Jack Johnson 5-Rocky Marciano 6-Gene Tunney 7-Bob Fitzsimmons 8-Jim Corbett 9-Muhammad Ali 10-Joe Frazier I could list several more. Point proved. I see Corbett and Fitz's Name. Walcott MIA! Go back to pre-K.
over 15 i'd pick walcott 62/38. jeffries was greater but walcott should have an advantage at long/mid range imo.
What you have listed is where those historians rank Jeffries and Walcott as regards there all time rankings, that has no bearing on the respective quality of their opposition ! God God Almighty! Now I have to explain your own posts to you! This would actually be hilarious if it wasn't so pitifully sad.:-( I'm embarrassed on your behalf!