Povetkins run as WBA champ. Wilders run as Champ. Won title from Stiverne Defended it against Molina Duhaupas Szpillka Arreola. Is that really any worse than... Won title from Chagaev Defended it against Boswell Huck Rahman(Who literally limped to the ring) Wawrycz At WORST, its on a par with it. Yet I don't remember Povetkin getting the same hate Wilder is getting
Undoubtedly, Wilders run is worse. Especially since he hasn't faced a mandatory in the 19 months he's had the belt.
i dont waste my time with trolls you comparing wilders record to povetkins is laughable you should be put out at the pasture and shot
Undoubtedly? Boswell who was 42. Rahman who beyond shot(literally limped to the ring) Huck who had never fought at HW And Wawrycz? That is UNDOUBTEDLY better than Wilders run?
Povetkins, buts that's not what this thread is about. People have made a huge deal out of who Wilder has fought as champ, and I'm simply making the point that Povetkins run as champ was as bad, and in all likelihood, worse.
No he was not, Wlad was. You're being dishonest on purpose. If you wanna compare Wilder's run as CHAMP then compare him to other champs, so Wlad was WBA champ.
povetkin has fought better men then wilder, but just not on his title run as WBA Champ. great thread.
Povetkin was WBA champ, Wlad was "Super champ"...you're splitting hairs. But if its so important to you, fine. Wlads first 4 defences in his first title run were against Derrick Jefferson Charles Shufford Frans Botha 41 year old Ray Mercer That's way better