Tyson's foot speed and the angles he threw combinations from would overwhelm even a prime Tua. The closes person to Tyson Tua fought was Iaubuachi. And he lost that convincingly. It was a tough fight but he lost it. Prime Tysons foot speed, and angles were much better then Iaubachi. Tyson threw shorter punches coming from angles Tua never seen before. Also Tysons ability to slip punches and close the distance is also a difference maker. Say Tyson stops Tua within 10 rounds.
How did Louis beat Carnera? How did Dempsey beat Willard? How did Tyson beat all of the guys during his career? How did Brewster beat Klitschko? How did Tua beat all of those guys during his career? Size matters when the smaller fighter doesn't know how to fight.
guy sorry but it is a trash post. 1-ibeabuchi never ever did beat tua convincingly.(i doubt even if you have watched more than a highlight),in fact a draw and a tua win is very debatable. 2- ibeabuchi was 6'2 with more reach than tyson and 235 pounds of muscle,tell me how is even close to tyson? 3- if tyson fought like ibeabuchi did with tua then he would lose by stoppage cause tua was stronger,more durable,he had more stamina. 4-i pick tyson by decision outworking tua using the brain,but your reasons are probably the worst that you could have picked
1st of all, you don't have a clue about me or my knowledge of the game. If you don't agree with my comments or opnions that's fine. But to come with the nonsense about what you think I saw is ridiculous. Take a look at boxrec. Its the fight I remember. Like I said a tough fight, but Iaubauchi beat him convincingly . In my opinion Tysons foot speed and the angles he threw punches from were better then Iaubauchi. So in my opinion Tyson would beat Tua more convincingly then Iaubachi did. If you don't agree Tysons foot speed and angles of attack were better than Iaubachi, that's your opinion. (Or maybe its YOU only watching highlights).