Again beating a 39 year old Klit is not impressive. I haven't even said there going to out jab him. Just Fury's jab isn't good. They don't need to jab at all to beat him.
Sports science has proved that a 60 year old man who trains properly can be as fit as a 20 year old man so Wlad at 39 is not old according to sports scientist he has been training practically his whole life and was the fittest 39 year old I ever saw Fury has a very good jab and great footwork both of these aspects of his game were better then Wlad's were Your post is nonsense old John L Sullivan is looking down upon Fury smiling He looks down upon you with scorn
How on earth can you watch KLit Fury and think Wlad looked fit and good. Sullivan laughs at Fury from on high.
No SULLIVAN is glad the lineal title is finally back in the hands of an irish man He is laughing at your lack of boxing knowledge Wlad came into the ring 100% fit and he lost to a superior boxer end of story
A 6'3" 210 pound former cruiserweight champion with an 82-inch (longer than Ali's) reach who was brutally hammered and stopped in seven by Fury. Again, what makes anyone think Tyson Fury is going 20 rounds with guys who Steve Cunningham would look like a giant standing next to?
Wlad was 39 and overrated to begin with. No one with an ounce of boxing knowledge would give him credit for that. Oh yeah Fury is British Gypsy not Irish. Sullivan laughs at your lack of knowledge of ethnicity.
No point talking to this fool from now on It's quite clear your the one with no boxing knowledge son nobody in this thread is agreeing with your rubbish:deal
If 100 people say a foolish thing it's still a foolish thing. Anyone who thinks Fury is good in anyway if spouting fiction. And most here are suffering from Nat Fleischer syndrome by seeing attributes from fighters that just aren't' there. :deal
When one finds himself on the side of the majority. It's time to pause and reflect and oh yeah, I thought you weren't talking to this old fool. :yep