Tyson Fury In 1900?

As great as old John L was he would never beat Setanta in a fight

Take care newb try to learn a bit more about boxing before you post here again you gave us all a good laugh here today with your idiocy

 

Everybody gets taken the distance eventually.

Fury would have to be able to fight for 20 rounds to ply his trade in that era.

 

I'm actually a journeyman your the newb person who doesn't know what not talking to someone means. Same to you dear friend. Old John L looks at you in scorn now. You've also given me some great laughs with your idiocy and your love of fat old men. :rofl

 

I don't see a problem with him doing that given he'd set the pace with that "stick" and his movement.

On the other hand, I do see the smaller, lighter guys who were used to going 20 rounds by leaning on each other and throwing a couple punches a round having a TON of trouble dealing with Fury.

Most would have eaten so many shots from that jab and clubbing right over the first half hour to 45 minutes, I doubt most of them would make it 20.

Fury would bring size and a style none of them would be comfortable with.

 

You are talking as if Fury was Lennox Lewis here.

The bottom line is that you never know how somebody would handle fifteen rounds if they have never been past twelve, so assuming that they would be fine over twenty is a real leap in the dark.

 

Sigh woe to a world that things this Fury has good movement. Like watching a chicken with its head chopped off. :hi:

 

I would like to see Johnson vs Fury the ring antics alone would be worth it.

 

Amazing! You have successfully described what I think every time you make a post! How do you do it!