Wrong again. Like I said earlier PBF never fought for the #1 spot because the #1 guy in Hatton turned him down. He wasn't given the opportunity to be #1 not because he chose the path of least resistance. What part of that do you not understand? The #1 guy wouldn't fight him and for good reason he knew he would get that work. You're mad because I exposed your lack of knowledge of boxing around the time when both were back at 140. You claimed Hatton never turned PBF down at 140, which is 100% false.:hi:
Both are great and unstoppable at their prime. IMO Golovkin is more versatile of the two. Tszyu was the man at 140 until he got old and Cotto came into picture. To me, Hatton was never #1 at 140 nor was Floyd. It wasn't the most competitive division back then, but it had great top 3 having Kostyu, Cotto, Hatton, junior Witter, judah, Floyd etc. Around. Some of you really have a point- Floyd didn't fight any top fighter at 140 for some reason.
His primary focus was Gatti at 140, he fought DLH 2 years later at 2 divisions north. He went for the money and the belt against the weakest champion.
LMAO you are the mad one fanboy. You've haven't proved anything apart from posting little waving emoticons. Again give us a link in which Hatton was offered and turned down Floyd. Not just some here say by fanboys like yourself and BlizzyBlizz blizzo.
What I find laughable is intense jealousy that comes from Floyd fans on here. I've never said he wouldn't of beaten Tszyu or Hatton at 140. What I have stated and is fact is that he fought the weakest champion and his resume is dog **** at 140. And he was never the number 1 in the division. And the little girls come straight in with their blind venomous insanity. They're as bad as the Pac turds they themselves call.
how bout I post a link of loeffler saying 164 and then another link of sanchez saying they never asked for that? like I said...only an utter idiot thinks everything exists on the internet is proof or truth....reading between lines works wonders sometimes if you gather enough info and assess it....ever heard of the word "inference"....