Who hits harder

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by foreman&dempsey, Jul 30, 2016.


  1. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    One single shot power(NOT THE BEST PUNCHER OR FINISHER)langford,dempsey and marciano,in order.who hits harder?
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,509
    27,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    If you put a gun to my head:

    1. Marciano
    2. Langford
    3. Dempsey

    But it could honestly be in any order.
     
  3. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,735
    47,525
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm not sure there's ever been a better one-punch finisher than Langford at any weight. SO i'd put him first. I think Marciano hit harder than Dempsey with one shot.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,735
    47,525
    Mar 21, 2007
    Maybe Dempsey would tend to hit harder with the second and third punch in a combo most of the time?
     
  5. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,232
    2,419
    Mar 26, 2005
    The Rock...so much damage...
     
  6. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,364
    9,266
    Jul 15, 2008
    Langford
    Dempsey
    Marciano

    Rocky loaded up almost every time which slightly over rates his power to me .. Langford was simply a freak of nature .. no other natural middleweight flattened as many quality heavyweights excluding Fitz ..
     
  7. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,822
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
    Marciano
    Dempsey
    Langford
     
  8. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    1. Dempsey
    2. Marciano
    3. Langford

    Dempsey and Marciano have equal power but Dempsey was was a more explosive puncher.

    Langford's power is on the level of the other two he just wasn't as consistent with his knockouts imo and he was bigger than Marciano and Dempsey.
     
  9. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    Langford was bigger than marciano and dempsey? Lmao guy stop exposing yourself
     
  10. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    Depends who they're fighting.
     
  11. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    What? The question is who hits harder, period
     
  12. Knights107

    Knights107 Member Full Member

    450
    211
    Aug 13, 2015
    I agree with mr.dago woop
     
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Seems like you're exposing yourself. Langford weighed from 190-200 most of the time at heavyweight at his best. Dempsey weighed 180 against Willard which was his best fight. Marciano weighed 187 at his best.

    More weight equals more tissue therefore Langford was bigger.

    Quit embarrassing yourself.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,509
    27,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    He might have a point, crazy as it sounds.

    Langford weighed nearly the same as Dempsey or Marciano at his peak, but he was much shorter.

    He had a bigger torso, shoulders, and head.

    He was not small, he was stunted.
     
  15. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    I never said that he was small,but he was not bigger than rocky or specially dempsey that had big frame and was much taller,so no,it is totally crazy