Léo Santa Cruz vs. Carl Frampton & Miguel Ángel García vs. Elio Rojas RBR

So if Frampton won 5 of them is it possible to give the other 7 rounds to LSC since there were really alot of close rounds that could have gone either way, throughout the fight? Maybe?

 

WAR JACKAL!! :bowdown

 

I gave LSC rounds 4, 6 and 11.

1, 7 and 10 were close, so yeah although my card looks wide I could see a draw, but you'd have to be looking for it imo

 

8-4 it was :nod

 

Sometimes a single flush jab, or straight right hand can sway a round in your favor in a tight round, imo.

 

I have to re-watch this fight. I thought Frampton won a close but clear fight(though I scored it off the top of my head), but so many people are calling a robbery, and it's not just the Mexican posters.

 

Yo.......... is this the forgotten ducky?

 

It was close, it's worth a rematch. I don't see a robbery though.

 

The punch stats are ****. It is obvious they just click away even when Fighters are catching alot of the punches on their gloves. If punch stats were calculated by ****ysts going over slow motion video of the rounds and released after the fight it would be more legit. Not some morons clicking away.

 

Gone but never forgotten :deal

 

Yes, you implied that they were separate, but as far as I know...defense is not officially recognized as a winning scoring category. So I simply put it as a sub-category of ring generalship.

You said that it is often "neglected", but I think its really a matter of how one views the purpose of defense in a fight. From what I understand defense is seen as a way for a boxer to achieve scoring criteria. While you appear to think of it as a criteria itself.

 

It absolutely is a criterion.

- clean effective punching.
- effective aggression.
- ring generalship.
- defense.

 

:nod

 

DUCKY!!! :hi:

 

Hmm, well I guess it is. Just looked it up. Seems kinda vague on how one would apply it to a fight, so i'd like to know how judges are suppose to look for this criteria.