Tyson Vs Max Baer

Yep.

 

Ridiculous reasons for a Baer win

Baer has neither the accuracy boxing skills or discipline to land on Tyson with any consistency.

And Tyson can take the odd punch which would land.

Stop the bull**** myth that as long as you stood up to Tyson and could take his punch you would win.

Baer goes the way of Ruddock at best he lasts the distance while getting beat up more likely he gets stopped within 4 rounds.

 

Max hits him like he did to Schmeling in 1933???.Fight is OVER!!!

 

BIG DEE HERE= Ridiculous reasons!! I just gave you the fight in a nutshell and a know nothing like you who says the bull**** myth. It isn`t a myth but fact,
the first fighter who walked into the ring that wasn`t scared shitless of Tyson was Douglas who I said in the days leading up to the fight that he would KO Tyson in the fight as every fighter that Tyson fought all had one thing in common besides being scared of Tyson and that was that none of them had a good uppercut in their arsenal. Buster Douglas had a great one
and if Rooney had still been his trainer Doulas would never got to within a country mile of Tyson as he knew the same things that Cus D`Amato and that was stay away from fighters with great uppercuts like Foreman and Douglas. Tyson was a pickaboo fighter which the powerful uppercut was it`s achillies heel. The punch that KOed him was the right uppercut followed by a straight right that sent him to the floor. Two punches by a man that wasn`t a patch as a puncher compared to Max Baer who hit Frankie Campbell so hard he tore his brain loose from the mounting tissues to his skull killing him.
Max Baer had wicked uppercut also. Comparing Baer to a decent heavyweight like Ruddock is whats ridiculous as Baer was a great heavyweight and Ruddock a good contender as his punch,chin and everything else he had
was just good and not great by any means. China-chined Tommy Morrison KOed the guy after climbing of the deck to do it. SO PLEASE TAKE YOUR CRAP ELSEWHERE JUNIOR.

 

I think Tyson would take a cozy decision here. I reviewed Baer/Schmeling in it's entirety a couple of days ago, and feel that Mike's speed, defensive head movement and shorter punching would be too much for Maxie to counteract effectively. Assuming both are at their very best, this one goes the limit. Mike had superior skills.

Tyson UD Baer

 

He would beat one of your favorites in Frazier as well. But then well know of your hate for Tyson, though you're normally a good poster.

 

You can talk your knowledge up all you want, but your ability to analyze fighter's abilities is trash.

 

Where do you think Tyson ranks resume wise at heavyweight, I think his resume is better than Frazier's.

 

What McGrain said was true. Tyson was more dominant at his best, and has the quantity of top fighters during his reign, but Frazier has the better top wins IMO, or at least the MUCH better top win.

 

Yeah but he has Rocky Marciano clearly beat. Holmes, Spinks, Tucker, Tubbs, Bonecrusher, Berbick, Ruddock, Bruno, Pinklon and Golota. Thats basically the entire 1986-1991 era except for Holyfield and Witherspoon.

 

Tyson is just too sharp and too great of a puncher for Baer. He is able to land at will and stop him in about 4-5.

 

Hey muchmoore where ya been? I hope you start postin more around here. good to see you bud. I was watching Tyson vs Tubbs the other day......DEVASTATING. No one had ever come close to stopping tubbs, tyson with one punch made tubbs look like he was on TV show dance with stars.

 

Lets not forget that Bowe and Witherspoon were pushed to the limit by this guy, bowe arguably lost.

 

Which is why this fight won't last long. Are we even sure Max will be serious here? Being a big puncher and having the ability to take one just means Max takes more punishment. Some of the reasons put forth here, notably by a certain someone, are plain laughable.

It's easy to underestimate Baer sure, but come on...