Sugar Ray Leonard v Terry Norris prime for prime

yea that was me saying 32 yr old Hagler was shot

did you happen to read the rest of the same post which said I was in attendance of Hag's sparring w the weaver triplets , two of which boxed rings around Marvin?

I know marvin, you dont otherwise you wouldnt even call his condition into question

 

That's hallucinations from your dementia meds... Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

simply put: no speed hagler allowed leonard a split win

whereas Terry's lightning fast moves, enabled Terry a lopsided win over vastly superior experienced rey lennard

rey resembled a turtle with gloves next to terry

 

dont be a poor sport; just appreciate the score like the rest of us

Norris 120

srl

106

 

Yep couldn't agree more ... Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

poor guy is still downtrodden because he has no score to point to

Like so:

Norris 120

srl

106

 

rey was fast becuz in those days they didnt have anyone w speed

then the era of Norris entered and like Dr. Ferdie said when witnessing the speed of Norris "this is HANDSPEED Ray!"

the world had never seen anything like it

and neither had rey unfortunately

Norris
120

srl
106

 

Agree - your points are so solid that I cavy help but agree with you .. Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Terry was slick, quick, and made rey lennard sick

 

you mean you cant argue with the score

well, how can you when it's there for all to see

 

suddenly the brash newcomer has little to say

 

I'm trying to ignore your stupid posts - they are so fkawed and weak i do better letting you destroy yourself - there is no need to debate you - your killing yourself


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

you mean, the score is killing YOU

Norris 120

srl 106

and you've simply ran dry b/c as I said, all you have is some ****ogy which you stole from a mag from 30 yrs ago

lennard had never faced anyone like Norris who could box, bang, N move

neither did he have the experience needed to deal with terry's speed

Duran was a lightweight

Benitez had little in the way of mobility

Hearns had a jab and some movement but few defensive maneuvers, couldnt clinch, and took shots square

Hagler, no speed, no punch, no mobility. little more than a stiff looking punching bag that lennard loves so much, a late 80s version of Kalule

to be frank, Nunn N Norris were the only opponents that mattered in the late 80s

lennard's record vs the speedsters: 0-2

 

This topic is retar*ed and boring and I vote that such future threads be banned.

 

Ditto


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk