Olympic Boxing

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tomm, Aug 2, 2016.


  1. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    well good thing is in cuba boxing has a massive fan base, and apparently pro boxing will be allowed in cuba, if la cruz went pro there he'd be a superstar, none of those guys kovalev or andre ward would stand a chance against him honestly
     
  2. On The Money

    On The Money Dangerous Journeyman Full Member

    29,548
    14,143
    Apr 4, 2012

    I know he's an elusive master, fair play to him there. But didn't land much more than the other guy and was on his bike, that's why he was boo'd. Do I sympathise with the boo's? Somewhat.
     
  3. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,912
    2,683
    Apr 17, 2009
    Loma is better
     
  4. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    :lol::lol: loma still has salido problems, sorry but i can guarantee you 100% he's nowhere near de la cruz and everyone who knows boxing knows this, la cruz went the whole tournament didn't lose a round, loma had controversial fights with toledo and a very close final aswell vs the asian fighter
     
  5. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,912
    2,683
    Apr 17, 2009
    and La Cruz has Falcao problems.

    La Cruz is great at what he does, but Lomachenko has more layers.
     
  6. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,402
    5,534
    Aug 10, 2015
    Did the Salido fight happen in the amateurs? Then why bring it up you assclown? We have never seen La Cruz in a 12 round fight either.
     
  7. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Loma is better.
     
  8. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    really falcoa a guy he's beaten 6 times? :lol: how many times has loma beat salido, you fanboys make me laugh
     
  9. BlizzyBlizz

    BlizzyBlizz Loyal Member Full Member

    31,293
    3,510
    Jun 25, 2013
    Amateur, Pro. Wtf are you even talking about?:lol:
     
  10. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    100% I can guarantee you de la cruz is on a different level to loma, he won the games without losing a round, loma has very controversial fights vs toledo and the final, it's no contest at all, technically loma isn't near his level sorry
     
  11. Gannicus

    Gannicus 2014 Poster of the Year Full Member

    13,452
    2,990
    Mar 4, 2014
    No one believes La Cruz is better. Only that weirdo who dreams to be passed around by the Cuban Boxing team in a weird orgy.
     
  12. deyell

    deyell MOLECULE FROM HELL. Full Member

    6,402
    5,534
    Aug 10, 2015
    Lomachenko is a more versatile fighter than La Cruz. Yer a clown and a disgusting nuthugger.
     
  13. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    :lol: I honestly couldn't care what you idiots think, he's better and anyone who knows boxing knows it not some deluded fanboy like you, this forum is laughable with morons like u who want wins to happen so lomas record looks better says it all, and with people saying conlan lost i just laugh at all of it,
     
  14. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    :lol::lol: I know ur a troll already with that moron grannicus, loma is 100% nowhere near cruz, salido with how crude he is dominated lomachenko,

    I've broken it down, but i can never get an answer from u trolls, cruz didn't lose a round in the tournament, loma had controversial fights over toledo and the asian fighter, I just laugh at how bad this forum is, your as bad as those idiots who said nikitin won, and know just about as little as them
     
  15. mikelazcano

    mikelazcano Guest

    As good as loma is he's not as technical as De la Cruz, and nowhere near cruz in boxing ability, loma has a pressure style alot like adilbek, probably there's not much different in talent between the kaz and loma tbh, I just laugh at the nonsense i read here, and i remember half of u idiots thought nikitin won :lol: