Sugar Ray Leonard v Terry Norris prime for prime

lol at your last fact

 

Name his regular fights and dates from 1981 til Norris -


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

sorry but you lose again . I posted the photographic proof eight years ago

 

Red you have lost every debate you have been in this site and got ran off of ESB,, your a perennial loser and hilarious that you think your scoring points with your stupid posts... Your the TAPtalk joke, don't you see it or get it.. No one takes your post seriously, as we know the level of boxing iq your working with..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

well that explains it then :rofl

 

Latineg.. So Hagler was out of his prime but Leonard was peak...lol. This guy red rooster is a comedy show.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

That's what I like about you; even though you get creamed daily, you still act as though you've won!

Hee-hee!

The beauty of it is that the burden of proof is on you

and you still havent delivered!

That's what's so great about having the facts on your side :smoke

Norris

120

srl

106

It's an argument that never gets old and never goes out of style

 

eight years ago. you werent born yet

 

Norris 120

srl 106

It's an argument that never gets old and never goes out of style!

moreover, it has the ability to make opponents to cry for mercy

 

Why did it take Norris THREE WHOLE FIGHTS to get a single win over Luis Santana ? Are you actually going to answer this question with a serious response or are you going to default to your usual " 120-106 " or whatever the fvck ?

 

Why did it take Norris three fights to beat journeyman Luis Santana?

Why couldn't Norris stop Rene Jacquot who was KO'd in a single round by Mugabi less than a year before?

Why did it take Norris 10 to stop Nick Rupa who was stopped quicker by journeyman James Hughes?

Why did Norris get battered from pillar to post by journeyman Keith Mullings?

 

more of your facts

 

Lol. - rooster will no doubt have an excuse ..like I said arguing with a dummy ( rooster) is dumb.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Whaaaaaaaaa, you posted photographic proof that Hagler was outboxed by the Weaver triplets? That's a rather impressive feat

 

still ducking the question.

see, when you are forced to change the subject, it means something is wrong

thus far, you have never answered it and that, along with this score Norris 120, srl 106 puts me in the driver's seat

again, how does a prime leonard who took 11 for Bonds, somehow take out Terry Norris

It cant be that difficult to answer if you're that confident in his ability to do so