Why does size matter?

Pathetic.

 

I'd say he did a pretty ****-poor job then. Didn't jab nearly enough to be effective; didn't have the footwork to stay out of range or turn Dempsey when he came within range; didn't look like he put much weight on Dempsey in the clinches I remember.

 

All you need to know about STOOL ( medical equivalent is sh!t ) Kevin is he believes Leonard beat himself in Montreal, and Roberto Duran had fuk all to do with it. That is where his perverted brain is coming from.

 

Hi, Foxy01! :smooch

 

Of course size matters in the only weight category whence it comes into play ( Heavyweight )

It is beyond stupid to think that 2 average fighters, 1 of which is 4 - 5 inches shorter, and 20 lbs lighter than the other are evenly matched.

That is why by and large Heavyweight boxing is pure sh!t.

 

dis twed dum
fizix

 

totally agree :good

I know this is not easy for you to say when you are aware how much bigger I am than you regardless to being older :thumbsup

 

being not fit enough for more than a few rounds makes you (soon) completely defenceless against the guy weighting less but fully fit.

its like entering the ring and saying "hey have free hits on me all this round mate". yeh that doesnt help in a boxing match. in the sense that getting koed doesnt help.

 

Lol, Klitschko fights totally different than Fury too. Want to discredit him, an all time reigning champ, for it as well?

 

It matters more than virtually everything in boxing. We look at so many fighters as Greats because they took great advantage of their size advantages in a certain weight class. Now throw them 3-4 weight classes up and watch them sink.