Stanley "The Michigan Assasin" Ketchel vs. Gennady "GGG" Golovkin

Golovkin easily. Stanley's old technique would be too easy for golovkin to smash through

 

GGG inside 4 rounds.

 

Has Golovkin beaten anyone as good as Billy Papke?

 

Golovkin by early ko after a few rounds of target practice.

 

I agree, imo boxing moved on after the early 1900's.There were exceptions,Johnson, Gans,Walcott, but Ketchel does look crude with a swing for the fences style .As you say, it really depends on what the rules and rounds are.

 

QUOTE="Mendoza, post: 18165036, member: 19227"]GGG inside 4 rounds.[/QUOTE]
Ridiculous, but predictable.20 fight Monroe goes 6rds but Ketchel goes out in 4. Murray goes into the 11th,Adama went into the 7th .Ketchel was stopped twice in 60 fights, once by the heavyweight champion.
Cretinous post!

 

All these people who say that boxing technique has evolved don't really know what they're talking about honestly. If they were referring to technique used in the late 1880s to early 1890s I would agree but not the early 20th century. Duran was the last fighter who could actually fight on the inside like the old fighters from the 1900s era.

That being said Ketchel is far more proven that Golovkin and I can guarantee you that if Golovkin went through Ketchel's resume he would come out with a few L's and at least 1 knockout loss.

 

If we are to base on the footage available, GGG eats him alive.

 

Because GGG is better at boxing.