Why does size matter?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, Aug 25, 2016.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    man dat 40 year long dash. men were made of different stuff back then.
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,675
    42,965
    Feb 11, 2005
    This totally incorrect. A 4.38 guy (legit fully auto timed) is at the very least good for a 10.4 - 10.5 100 meters... if not much faster. You are way off.
     
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    The Wall street journal, not me.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, the 5.7 must be laps of the earth right?
    Seeing as he started at age 48, he must have finished when he was 88, so 5.7 laps is not bad.
    I mean, to even COMPLETE the 40 years dash requires greatness, nevermind the distance achieved.
     
  5. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    Sorry, meant to say 40 rear dash.

    I tell yah, they don't make em like they used to
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,675
    42,965
    Feb 11, 2005
    It was from a decathlon he did in college. And if case you are wondering, the 100 meters is the first event.
     
  7. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    Source?
     
  8. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Most small guys can't get to super heavyweight without steroids or being fat. A lot of those that do sacrifice stamina and effectiveness.
     
  9. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,563
    Jan 30, 2014
    Who said anything about a 400?
    Did it make sense to you when you copied it?
     
  10. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    that's what I thought, I was thinking the 40 yard was misinterpreted as 400 yard/m with 11 something seconds per 100.
     
  11. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    yeh excess weight is just a nono in cardio sports, and that's across the board at the top level. too much extra oxygen demand to be effective. don't matter how hard you can hit when you cant last more than a few rounds or cant manage more than 2 combos before you are puffing.
     
    Boxingfan712 likes this.
  12. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    I'd proffer than to even CONTEMPLATE it means greatness. The mental pressure of thinking it would induce multiple heart attacks and strokes in a normal sane man.
    So you've just achieved ATGness, Unforgiven.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    59,675
    42,965
    Feb 11, 2005
    I will guarantee you that I know more about the sport of Athletics than any writer for the WSJ. They are way off.
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yeah, I think I'm going to just sit here for the next 40 years now, resting on my laurels and getting my breath back.
     
  15. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    They ran Perry off this forum for making claims like these. I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, but providing a more accurate conversion for the run times would make you way more convincing.

    Anyway, like I said, I think Brown was slightly less fast than Peterson, but better overall.

    Still don't have a source for Browns time?
    I've heard his time was different, but I haven't seen a direct source.