If Ward And Kovalev Can Book A Fight A Year Out.......

It's totally different, because this is the biggest fight financially that can be made. 8 figures by its own standing is a great offer but in the context of what this fight would generate then the percentage split is the fair way to go.

"Fighting Welterweights" is a strange use of plural. Eubank Jr was the original choice and we see hwo that went, so Hearn offered Brook. Was it a farce? Absolutely. It did however give GGG a lot of exposure to the UK casual market which he didn't have before so from a business sense it was a great move, from a legacy sense no it wasn'y.

He isn't twice Canelo's size either, that's just stupid. Canelo doesn't have to move up to 160 at all, he can stay at 154 if he wants to. The demand for him to do so came when he started fighting above 154 which is...well, middleweight. And of course he then held the WBC title for 160 pounds, so I think asking him to fight guys at that weight was pretty fair game.
Have a look at how he looked size wise against Smith and honestly tell me he looks too small for middleweight.
As for GGG moving up, again that's his call. He seems to make 160 perfectly and Canelo is the biggest fight in boxing right now, I don't think beating Groves or Degale does anything more for his legacy than beating Canelo would. Especially given his impressive CV you mentioned.

 

Right, let's kill this notion Golovkin is twice Canelo's size because you are exaggerating something that isn't remotely close to being true. Twice his size ffs.

Height: Canelo 5"9 Golovkin 5"10

Reach: Canelo 70" Golovkin 70"

Weight: Canelo was fighting at 155 and looked awful, Golovkin weighed in for Brook 158.9, so less than 4lb, Brook weighed in heavier than Golovkin.

Canelo is not a tiny little LMW and Golovkin isn't a huge middleweight.

 

Tyson was 5"10 with 70" reach. Height and reach don't = size. Golovkin is naturally a lot thicker than Canelo. theres no way he could boil down to 154, he'd be a walking corpse. He wouldn't even give up 2 pounds against Brook who wanted the fight at 158.

 

Honestly I don't see a difference. There's just more GGG fans than there are Kovalev fans, which is why they're pushing the issue more then and now, compared to Kovalev-Ward. It's just haters who can't wait that are making the fuss.

 

Have you ever seen pictures of them sparring? Canelo was younger then, I'm sure he was still fighting at 147, have a look at the size of them side by side, Go and have a look, just type in "Golovkin Canelo Spar" and come back and tell me Golovkin is twice the size of him.

everybody is different when it comes to making weight, some can cut a lot and some can't.

the reason I mentioned what I did was a basic tale of the tape lists height, reach, weight... It does not list leg size, shoulder width, torso etc

Also I never heard of Brook wanting 158, not once, maybe I missed it. Hearn said he offered him the fight and he took it, never once mentioned a request for 158.

 

GGG was standing in the back of canelo.. that's photo trickery..

 

ffs

So the pictures of them shoulder to shoulder each raising a fist? I suppose that was photoshopped?

Or maybe that was photo trickery because Ginger people in certain light look like they have massive heads?

Or maybe, Abel Sanchez with help of the illuminati took that picture and immediately tampered with it because they knew in a few years there was a potential fight and Canelo would claim to be too small so they created evidence so I (and others) could discredit Canelo and Oscar by coming on forums and claiming there really is no size difference.

 

Photo shopped and photo trickery are 2 different things.

It's quite easy to take a picture at a lower angle trying to make the taller guy look the same size as the shorter guy standing in front of him. How do you photo shop an image that's already taken at a certain angle?

 

Firstly I apologise for missing half inch off Golovkins height, and Canelo is listed as 5"9. I didn't just make it up, he lists himself as 5"9.

I suppose Canelo is lying, but I thought he always tells the truth?

Also if that's the case I should add half an inch to Canelo's reach as it's listed as 70 1/2.

 

Yes I know.

So what about the side by side shots? Photo trickery too?

 

So why did use photo shop to try to make a point?

 

You make me laugh, you're a joker, you are full of excuses for Canelo so I thought I'd suggest another one for you, help you out, you must be tired, you've had a very long week with your head rammed deep in Canelo, I thought I was being kind.


and you're still not answering my perfectly reasonable question.

WHAT ABOUT THE SIDE BY SIDE SHOTS?

 

Ah.. **** it.. you don't even know the difference between photo shopped and photo trickery.. lol