John Ryder was robbed.

I thought it was a close fight but by no means a robbery, there was no complaints from john's corner

 

From what I seen it was close but would have gum oven it to Ryder. The thing that made me think twice is Ryder's body language after the fight. There were no celebrations or smiles, which straight away told me he didn't think he'd got it. The fighters are the ones in the ring and know how a fights gone.

 

I thought Ryder won but is there anyone who wants to see him fight again? I find his fights incredibly difficult viewing.

 

Not entirely sure how Ryder is hanging onto his Matchroom contract. He doesn't look to have what it takes to hang in and around British level.

I thought it was close last night- tricky to score as Arnfield is rangy.

 

nepotism
ˈnɛpətɪz(ə)m/
noun
noun: nepotism
the practice among those with power or influence of favouring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.

 

so your saying being hit by the jab doesn't matter?
If jack landed 100 jabs and john 90 head and body shot jack should win?

 

In your opinion he won the fight. It was close, I had it a draw. Ryder basically gave the last few rounds up like he always does and this time it cost him. He wasn't even blowing. Unless you leave everything in the ring then your leaving yourself open to not getting the decision. Ryder was technically the superior boxer but his OWN lack of output was what let him down.

 

Ryder won 9 rds. The worst decision for a while.

 

I did find this decision a head scratcher to be honest. Arnfield plinked away with jabs, straights and the odd uppercut but Ryder for me landed the better punches throughout, at a range where he was most comfortable. I can't find enough rounds for Arnfield to justify giving him the fight.

 

Exactly what I'm saying if he lands more punches he wins the fight,example Damian Kelly great boxer relied hugely on his jab and won British titles with that punch

 

Where you on the drink last night mate lol