Take away from his resume, the Thomas Hearns victory. Due to Hearns breaking his famous right-hand in the opening round, and what does he have left?.. A close one-point, decision win over an old former 135lb Champion. A landslide, humiliating points defeat to a former champion, who was having only his second fight in over 5 years... Does he really make the list of All Time Great Middleweights? Sugar Ray Robinson Harry Greb Sam Langford Stanley Ketchel Carlos Monzon Jake LaMotta Marcel Cerdan Freddie Steele Gene Fullmer Tiger Flowers Bob Fitzsimmons Mickey Walker Ezzard Charles Roy Jones Jr. James Toney Bernard Hopkins Dick Tiger
Troll alert Fullmer better than Hagler? GTFO. He beat a faded Robinson. Hearns only lost to Hagler because he broke his hand? GTFO Hagler beats Hearns 10/10 with resilence and power.
He beat plenty of good middleweights. I'm possibly among the biggest supporters of Marvin Hagler on this forum, I rate him above Ray Leonard and above Thomas Hearns "pound for pound / all-time" and almost on a par with Roberto Duran. But I do think it is reasonable to have a middleweight top 10 that excludes him, simply because the division is so deep historically.
Hagler was a monster. At his best, the Minter bout, he was a very rare combination of skill, speed, power and contained fury. Giving others every benefit of the doubt he's got to be mid top ten. Likely higher.
Fullmer would "murder" Hagler.. Fullmer was one of the strongest, most powerful middleweights in history. Your quote he beat a "faded Robinson" is laughable, it shows how very little knowledge you have, of boxing and its history. Gene Fullmer beat a very good 160lb version of Ray Robinson. Fullmer defeated many excellent 160lb champions and challengers, throughout his incredible career. Marvin Hagler brings nothing to the dance, in which to bother Gene Fullmer. Hagler at 5'7'' and lacking in punch-power, would be meeting the powerfullest fighter in his career in Fullmer. Gene defeated many fighters Ray Robinson struggled with, or lost fights too, during that incredible period of Middleweight history. Are you claiming Hearns NEVER broke his right hand in the opening round against Hagler? Hearns fought unbeaten James Shuler on Hagler vs Mugabi, co- main event card in Las Vegas. Hearns wanted a rematch with Hagler, due to him breaking his hand in their fight and him being No1 contender. Hagler wanted absolutely nothing to do with a Thomas Hearns rematch. Hagler only ever fought Class C fighters or men from the lighter weight classes. Mugabi (154lb) Antuofermo (154lb) Hamsho (154) Duran (135lb) Hearns (147lb) ... Hagler even struggled to beat most of them.
fullmer defeated some excellent champions and contenders. Most of whom are vastly superior to every fighter Hagler ever fought, with the exception of Leonard, Duran, Hearns (broken hand). Ray Robinson (twice) Dick Tiger (draw) Tiger Jones (twice) Rocky Castellani Florentino Fernandez Benny Peret (Brutal beating) Joey Giardello Carmen Basilio (twice) Spider Webb (twice) Gil Turner (twice) Edwardo Lausse Wilf Greaves Paul Pender
no trolling here.. didn't you block me you claimed? after you could not answer any of my Trivia questions lol sour grapes eh lol
Yes I blocked you , but I've been away on holiday,my grandson has been busy on the key board. Lausse beat Fullmer. Back on ignore.Troll.
Your grandson must have been reading my posts then and decided to take me off ignore Lausse vs Fullmer was one of the best fights of 1955
I never really stopped to think about just how deep MW historically actually was. Those are some heavy duty names up there. Maybe what could give Hagler the edge over a lot of them is that he practically made his career at middleweight. Some of those other guys fought at heavier weights, whereas Hagler was never particularly big even as a MW. It's the first time that it struck me that Hagler might be argued not to make top 5. I mean, wtf?
The Middleweight Division has a very rich and deep history and Hagler's place is well sealed within it; primarily due to the consistency of his career record. No surprise, really, when you consider what an all-round game Hagler possessed; both boxer and brawler; both southpaw and orthodox. I've seen and heard critics often citing his strategic failures (Antuofermo I; Duran; Leonard), as marks against him and, even if these points might well hold water, they aren't enough to take away from his overall presence in the Class. At his clinical best, Hagler was nigh on perfection. Other than Leonard, in his very last bout, he beat every man he ever faced; his KO percentage, over 67-fights, is also quite remarkable. Add to this that Hagler never looked like being KO'd in all that time and you have a strong argument to make in favor of him beating any Middleweight in history. Hagler is definitely Top-10 and most probably a Top-5 Middleweight of All Time.