I'd probably put him in the top 10 middleweights, but it's no certainty, and I seem to rate him higher "p4p" among his "fab 4" peers than most people here.
what is the argument for fitz>hagler at 160? it isn't film, because there is no bob film at 160 it isn't resume because bob did most of his best work >160 it isn't biggest win because dempsey was ill, small for the weight and not a moq fighter anyway. what else is there?
Fitzsimmons weighed sub-160 for some of his wins over 'heavyweights'. He was actually a middleweight. He was 158 pounds when he destroyed the 195-pound Gus Ruhlin, a top HW contender.
a top ten that is based on beating men who aren't mw's is limited to pre 1920ish fighters. hagler sure doesn't make that top 10, but neither do greb, robinson, charles, burley, monzon, hopkins ect, i would say a mw top ten that excludes all those guys and stops in 1920 isn't worth much in 2106.
The list doesn't have to be based on beating men over 160 (while weighing sub-160), but those feats should count for something if it's a case of beating ranked fighters. I don't believe if would all be pre-1920. There aren't many Fitzsimmons around in any era. There's only one.
Robinson never fought anyone close to Hagler at 160. In fact he may be over rated at 160 based on who he actually fought and defeated. That being said he was Ray Robinson and the early 1951 version would be an exceptionally thought fight for anyone based on his speed, power, chin and stamina. Hagler / Robinson would be a monster match up .. Sam Langford in my opinion beats anyone at 160. No one hit harder, fought better opposition, was stronger or better .. he could have fought his whole career at 160 but didn't because no one would fight him .. "Wholl Fight Sam Langford! (A Pugilistic Nursery Rhyme) I. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, said Stanley K., Britt has taken me away And Im signed to do a play. Then Im going to the hay. Ill not fight Sam Langford. II. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, said Jack the Twin. I am careful of my chin And Im pretty near all in, And suicides a sin. Ill not fight Sam Langford. III. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, is Papkes wail, Im a lily white and pale And my life is not for sale; Why Id sooner got to jail. Ill not fight Sam Langford. IV. Wholl fight Sam Langford Not I, said Kid McCoy; Im a pretty game old boy, But this unrefined employ I will leave for hoi polloi. Ill not fight Sam Langford. V. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, said poor old Fitz. Though Id fight for just six bits, Still I havent lost my wits; Ill preserve my speckled mitts. Ill not fight Sam Langford. VI. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, said Hugo Kelly. He would pound me to a jelly And Id lose some vermicalli. Not for me. What ta helli? Ill not fight Sam Langford. VII. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, said Joe da Grim. I no like to fight with him Cause he shutta up my glim And da chances are too slim Ill notta fight Sam Langford. VIII. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not I, Al Kaufman said. You are crazy in the head. Chase yourself and go to bed. I aint anxious to be dead. Ill not fight Sam Langford. IX. Wholl fight Sam Langford? Not us. The low brows cried. And they turned around to hide. Nix: the color line is wide, And were going to stay inside. Well not fight Sam Langford.
I rate Robinson highly at 160 but not higher than guys like Hagler and Monzon who did great things there and stayed for their entire career. Langford I consider a heavyweight. Not so much of a middleweight. I think he beats a great deal of fighters in history and is in the top 10 p4p but I don't consider him to beat Hagler. Nobody knocks Hagler out. Hagler had the skills to beat Langford as well.
A split decision, not to say one of the most controversial decisions in the 80's, is now a "walk in the park"?
He dominated a division, had some tough fights past best Duran & Leonard but some good wins and a long reign absolutely puts him in top 10, I have him close to the top around 5-7ish
Yes, Hagler is very likely a top-10 middleweight. Personally, I think his opponents from his championship reign have slowly become overrated, but regardless, he still conquered some quality foes, consistently. His pre-title run was solid and his skill-set is superb, too; and in a head-to-head sense it seems he would beat most, maybe all.
Indeed. Fitzsimmons is often ranked in the Top-10 ATG Middleweights, when most of his notable work is at a heavier weight. He won and held the Middleweight title for several years, albeit doing little with it in that time and, because he is an All Time Great Fighter, it's perhaps difficult to rate him at Middleweight. I think Fitzsimmons gets a lot of kudos for his feats against much bigger men. However, with such a thin record in the then relatively undefined Middleweight Class, how far this distinction adds to his Middleweight credentials is questionable. So, perhaps a better argument could be made for Ruby being outside of the Top-10 ATG Middleweights than...say...one for Hagler being outside of that list.
Having read all your replies to my posts. I find your comments to be truly outragous, laughable, fanciful and just plain incorrect. You must feel, like you are talking to nursery school children about the sport of boxing, not men who have had a vested interest in the sport, for most of their adult life. Take a look at your comments above. Look into what you are trying to imply here. From first post on this thread, you have tried to "Rubbish" the career's of Robinson, Monzon, Fitzsimmons, BHop, Langford, etc etc etc. in an attempt to make Marvin Hagler's limitations look better than what they are. Sugar Ray Robinson, who is universally recognised by all leading Boxing Historians, and Historical Organisations as P4P The Greatest Fighter of All Times. Robinson won the middleweight title, no fewer than five times. Yet you are claiming, "Hagler would be favourite to beat him" You claim that you personally, "Rate Hagler higher than Robinson".. You rubbish the power and ability of Sam Langford. Making claim, "Hagler beats him".. a laughable comment. You make claim of Haglers skills. Well which of Marvin Haglers fights can i watch, to see his amazing skills, which you talk of?.... I cannot for a second, go along with your assumption, "Nobody knocks Hagler out" - Sam Langford carried knock out drops in both hands! You then try to make claim, "Langford was a heavyweight, Robinson was a welterweight, Fitzsimmons was a Heavyweight etc etc etc.. All in the hope, you can eliminate them from The Top 10 Middleweight of all Time. You make claim the H2H match-ups i posted are "Extremely Inconsistent" - well very few seem to be disagreeing with them. Maybe you should, put up how you see those H2H dream match-ups unfold. Because a one-point, razor thin decision, over a 33 years old former 135lb champion, who had never fought at 160lb in his career, is no claim to greatness in my book. John Mugabi this, and John Mugabi that, does nothing for his standing. The Great Fighters from the past of the 160lb division, like Robinson, Langford, Ketchel, Cerdan, Steele, Monzon, Fitzsimmons, Walker, Fullmer all had acheived vastly, more than Marvin Hagler acheived. All had resume's, stacked with world class victories, over world class opponents, with those opponents being in their prime. How many of Marvin Hagler's opponents are destined for the IBHOF ?
You haven't seen around 30 Cerdan fights there arent that many filmed fights of his in existence. I saw Gary Duff's fights several times.His Father Mickey Duff had f*ck all to do with it,Gary had the UK franchise from Bill Cayton who with his partner Jim Jacobs amassed a huge collection.You sure are one condescending twerp talking to posters here as though they know jack sh*t and you know it all ,what a jumped up trolling little twat,you are!
Robinson won the title 5 times but do so he had to lose it each time, he was beatable at160lbs. Monzon never lost his title. How many great middles did Langford beat? A NWS win over Ketchel which was a bagged fight name another win over a top class middleweight. Where are Cerdan's great wins ? A washed up Zale? Fitzsimmons time as middleweight champion coincided with perhaps the shallowest talent pool the division has seen, he beat a sick champion who was past prime what else did he do there? BtW the weight limit was some 6 lbs lower then. You claim everyone of the historians has Robinson at n1 p4p that isn't true ,quite a few have Greb in that position.You mentioned Mickey Duff in another inaccuracy about the supposed 30 odd fims of Cerdan you claim to have seen[,you haven't,] well Duff, a shrewd judge of fighters picked both Monzon and Hagler to beat Robinson.Glad I hadn't put you back on ignore,its always nice to expose a fraud.