When will GGG get respect?

Lemieux is definitely more capable fighter than Gatti. Gatti would have been destroyed by Kostya, Cotto, Judah, Mosley, Hatton etc. He was just a belt holder - he was small, had no power, no skills but was entertaining brawler.

Lemieux is still in process of reaching his ceiling. At least he has serious power and that can take you a long way (Pavlik). Nobody except Golovkin, would stop him at the moment. And looking back former champions, I would give him a good chance to beat Taylor and Abraham. Unfortunately, we have to wait and see what he accomplishes (on the contrary to Gatti).

 

Lemieux is entertaining but lets be honest he's a club fighter and won't ever sniff the HOF. Gatti was better and beat much better fighters than Lemieux. Lemieux is stuck in a bad position he can't move up to 168 because he would get KTFO he can't move down to 154 because he can't make the weight and I would favor everyone in the top 5 at MW to destroy him. The peak of his career was when he was a prospect many years ago it will only get worse from here on.

 

I will come back to this in couple of years..

 

Fair enough!

 

That article was from February child. When it came to sign to fight, 6 months later, Brook's promoter had no qualms about 160. In fact, they signed within 24 hours when they were given the option of facing 3G. nice try c*nt.

Dino, if you are going to pretend to be the smarter guy between us, at least BE the smarter guy. Thanks!

 

That clearly means that 155 was rejected. You really are the stupidest motherfugger on here aren't you?

 

Look idiot...we are talking about the actual negotiation that took place before the signing of the fight. Fact of the matter is, Brook and his team accepted the fight no questions asked. They didn't ask for a catchweight. They didn't claim to need more money. They accepted and signed.

You want to point to an article 6 months prior, when Brook wasn't even a real consideration as an opponent at the time, as some proof they wanted a CW? You are a special kind of stupid aren't you?

You know you are wrong here. But you'll never admit it. Because you're a little p*ssy who's afraid to admit he's wrong.

 

How do you know they didn't ask for a CW during negotiations?? Were you sitting there in the room? They asked once , which obviously means they would've asked again. You you actually believe they didn't try and gain an advantage for themselves in a fight against Golovkin.??
You really are one stupid motherfugger

 

Oh good lord...now you are going to play semantics.... You really are pathetic when your tail is between your legs.
Feel free to find anything that suggests they wanted a CW when actually given the fight. All you have is cynicism and hatred for 3G to go on. C'mon Team Delete, find it, you can do it!

 

He is sounding smarter, just to let you know. But please carry on, you're entertaining me...

 

Look , i can't be allowing myself to be dragged down to your level , ok? Read the quotes , take your loss and move on to twart somebody else.

http://www.topix.com/forum/boxing/middleweight/T1HRU68P6H4QTPIKU

https://audioboom.com/boos/4352660-eddie-hearn-kell-brook-beats-golovkin-at-155


http://www.boxingnewsresults.com/2016/02/kell-brook-calls-golovkin/

 

No surprise you agree with his ridiculous assertion. Feel free to back him up with tangible evidence if you'd like.

 

Those are also from February. just like the original one you posted rain man. So, when Eubanks jr backed out, and Brooks stepped up, did he ask for a CW? Nope. As I stated, they went right to signing.

 

Brook signed to face 3G in July. No where in that time period did Brook's team ask for 155. They signed right away to face 3G, reportedly withing 24 hours of being contacted. Likely due tot he time constraint. The 155 was asked about in February, when they weren't even an option. It was something they just tossed out there. Got it rain man?

 

Because the CW was rejected. Agreeing to the full 160 was the only way the fight could get made. They made a concession , GGG wouldn't make any. ... Are you seriously this dumb or are you purposefully lying you protect Golovkins name?