Who wins prime golovkin with prime Hopkins

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pincai, Oct 12, 2016.


GGG vs Hopkins prime

  1. GGG by KO

    18 vote(s)
    19.4%
  2. GGG by decision

    20 vote(s)
    21.5%
  3. Hopkins by KO

    3 vote(s)
    3.2%
  4. Hopkins by decision

    52 vote(s)
    55.9%
  1. joeyp130

    joeyp130 Active Member Full Member

    927
    247
    Dec 15, 2013
    I consider myself a GGG fan, but I would predict Bhop in this one. Just too many tricks up his sleeve. The guy knows how to control pace and range.
     
  2. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    7,733
    10,242
    Jun 10, 2012
    The only plus for GGG is power and even that is debatable. Hopkins has more size, skill, strength, defense, ring iQ, chin, dirty tricks,mental game.. Not saying GGG can't win but the odds are against him.
     
  3. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,600
    34,427
    Jun 23, 2005
    Yes but that doesn't change the fact that he was 49 now does it. What other fighter besides Hopkins are fighting at that age? Hopkins was well beyond his prime in that fight, be serious.
     
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,406
    78,662
    Nov 30, 2006
    Everything that Golovkin does well (and there are MANY things), Hopkins knows how to neutralize.

    ...and yes, Hopkins can be put down, but KEEPING him down is a fools' errand. Go at him with the disposition of a puncher thinking KO and you just get embarrassed worse/faster.
     
    UnleashtheFURY likes this.
  5. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,219
    22,338
    Jul 21, 2012
    Martin Murray was able to push back Golovkin in the clinch. He controlled in him in there and Golovkin exhibited little to no inside skills. Do the mathematics here

    Martin Murray
     
  6. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,406
    78,662
    Nov 30, 2006
    Lol, right.
     
  7. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    34,432
    36,782
    Aug 28, 2012
    Hopkins has too much height and reach. Plus, he fights dirty and is good at spoiling. He'd literally hug GGG to death.
     
    MUFA$A likes this.
  8. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,406
    78,662
    Nov 30, 2006
    Exactly. It would be ugly, but he'd get the W. Par for the course, basically. Golovkin is special but doesn't have any x factor to prevent his boxing getting spoiled the way Hopkins spoiled untold dozens'. It would somewhat call to mind the victory of Bernard's rival Calzaghe over Kessler, actually. Golovkin could make some adjustments but he wouldn't be the one that ultimately made the most or the best adjustments.
     
    Moanamchara and UnleashtheFURY like this.
  9. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Literally?
     
  10. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    34,432
    36,782
    Aug 28, 2012
    Literally.
     
  11. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    BHop is a monster.
     
  12. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    396,406
    78,662
    Nov 30, 2006
    *Alien.
     
  13. ATG22

    ATG22 Active Member Full Member

    533
    480
    Oct 22, 2014
    True. Great performance by Murray.
     
  14. MUFA$A

    MUFA$A FEAR * THE * TANK Full Member

    1,478
    954
    Aug 17, 2016
    Gerald McClellan is a monster.

    B hop is unique

    B hop is great

    B hop is one of a kind

    But i would not label him as a monster.
     
  15. plank46

    plank46 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,475
    83
    Aug 23, 2013
    there needs to start being "who gives a **** about hypothetical bs" choices in these endless garbage threads.