mostobviousalt says it is Ali. His reasoning is that Ali pushed his head down. I say Foreman. My reasoning is Foreman threw other fighters around like rag dolls and it was said Liston was the only one in sparring who could stand up to Foreman's strength.
It's extremely difficult. Frazier manhandled Ali on a couple of occasions. Foreman ragdolled Frazier. Ali appeared to have no strength deficit when he fought Foreman. If i was guessing who could press or push a heavier weight i'd go for Foreman. Functional strength in the boxing ring is more about core strength and balance though. Momentum plays its part in individual squabbles. It's a very difficult question to answer for these reasons.
So the actual question is: who wrestled better, Ali or Foreman? That I have no opinion on. But sheer strength? Foreman.
Well, yes, i'm presuming in fairness that the question is being asked in the light of boxing rather than weightlifting. If it's a weightlifting question, that, I have no opinion on. Out of interest, what are you basing your "sheer strength" answer on? Is it him carrying that animal or something else or is there actual information on what they lifted?
Foreman's strength in there was immense. Having said that Ali had no problem whatsoever containing it. It's deffo Foreman for me with the proviso that H2H with Ali it did not help him much at all. Ali was also strong in there but Foreman is a freak.
Foreman is said by many on here to be stronger than Vitali in h2h match ups fyi. Strength in the ring is used to keep opponents off of you, push them around, and outright control them. Who would you put your money on to push Sonny Liston around in the ring. Ali from Rumble in the Jungle or Foreman from Rumble in the Jungle?
And how do they come by this conclusion? I think we'd see pretty much the same thing if it were Liston in the ring; which is to say a) i'd guess Liston and Foreman are about as strong as each other (Foreman testified to something along these lines) and b) neither Liston or Ali would appear to be the stronger in the ring, for the same reasons that Ali did no appear (to me) to be any less strong than Foreman in Kinshasa.
We come by this conclusion of what Foreman and Vitali did in the ring. Foreman man handled opponents. Vitali didn't. So from what they both showed in performances against common opponents. Who would you deduce was stronger?
If Vitali didn't, why is it of import that Foreman was stronger than him in the opinion of "some posters here"? Foreman. Due to style and approach he had more cause to exhibit superior strength. Ali meanwhile spent a lot of time playing possum and dancing, thereby having less reason to exhibit his strength. However, in deducing who was stronger out of two men, i'd turn most immediately to direct confrontation between the two. Having taken all of this into account, I'd say that it is a very very difficult question to answer and certainly not so straight forwards as many people would believe. I think that, with a gun to my head, I'd say that Ali looked the stronger in the ring in DRC.
Because we have had h2h match ups between them on here. It is my observation that Ali looked stronger perhaps because of the high heat that night in Zaire and his stamina advantage. Foreman had terrible stamina at that point and that was what Ali exploited. Doesn't matter how strong a fighter is, high heat+bad stamina is going to take that strength away. Foreman wasn't even putting up a fight strength wise. He was just looking to land that 1 punch.
Yes, I don't think there's a difference between second career Ali and Foreman that would matter. That said, you can conjure footage to cast that statement in doubt should you wish to do so, so who knows.
I'm reminded of what Karate Champion Joe Hess said about Ali, that he was," super strong".As you say you can find bits of footage that will boost the case for whatever one you choose.