Rocky Marciano vs. David Haye

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by reznick, Oct 13, 2016.



Who would win?

  1. Maricano UD

    3 vote(s)
    5.8%
  2. Marciano KO

    38 vote(s)
    73.1%
  3. Haye UD

    1 vote(s)
    1.9%
  4. Haye KO

    10 vote(s)
    19.2%
  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,582
    Mar 17, 2010
    12 Rounds, who wins?
     
  2. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,811
    168
    Aug 26, 2013
    Marciano gets to him at some point. I can't see Haye making it to the 12th
     
  3. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,977
    2,021
    Mar 26, 2005
    Marciano by murder!!!....David Haye??...really??
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,658
    5,681
    Jan 22, 2009
    Jesus ****ing Christ
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    70,042
    24,051
    Feb 15, 2006
    There is only one certainty in this kind of math up.

    Haye would never take the fight unless Marciano was the only road to a title, or a significant pay day.
     
  6. MUFA$A

    MUFA$A FEAR * THE * TANK Full Member

    1,479
    953
    Aug 17, 2016
    David Haye will look amazing against Marciano.

    That is for the first 4, 5, 6 rnds.

    Marciano turns up the heat...

    And well...

    It wont end well for Haye..
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    53,979
    32,949
    Feb 11, 2005
    If the Rocks skin holds up, and the ref allows his rough stuff, Haye goes night night.
     
  8. emallini

    emallini Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,279
    2,527
    Mar 16, 2008
    Haye too fast. Stops Rocky via TKO in 8.
     
  9. whopperdong

    whopperdong "sorry dan, im the man" Full Member

    4,269
    138
    Jul 10, 2011
    Times change, physicality advantage is huge.
    Haye would ko him imo.
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,511
    7,386
    Dec 31, 2009
    The physical advantage is most certainly not huge.

    I've met Haye. 6'1" tops. The guy is no bigger than Ezzard Charles when he's not fighting. Those tale of the tape stats are total baloney. 6'3" my ass!

    Muhammad Ali was a size bigger than Holyfeild and Haye type guys yet to read tale of the tape those guys were supposed to be the same ball park. They were not.

    Once guys move up to heavyweight the height stats are exadurated. In fact, almost nobody is as tall as they are billed. I expect it.
     
    Last edited: Oct 15, 2016
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    95,101
    24,870
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think the weight Haye actually fought at as a heavyweight is the relevant figure posters are comparing to Marciano.ie His average weight as a heavyweight is 217lbs, therefore he has an average weight advantage of 30 lbs over Marciano. That is a significant weight disparity imo. I think an objective poster would recognie it and say so , but hey ho.
     
    whopperdong likes this.
  12. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,582
    Mar 17, 2010
    You are absolutely right. The only thing is, you seem to insinuate that the 100lb difference between Haye and Valuev is irrelevant. And that all of a sudden, style must be considered into the equation.

    Seems flip floppity.
     
    MUFA$A and choklab like this.
  13. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,751
    Jul 1, 2015
    But what does he do with that weight? Does it make him faster? A smarter fighter? A better inside fighter? Quicker feet? A better chin or punch than Marciano?
     
  14. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    Haye is certainly faster than Marciano, and also quicker on the feet.

    Those two things are certain.
     
  15. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,751
    Jul 1, 2015
    Is that a direct result of the weight increase?