Sonny Liston Is Asked To Describe His Ideal Opponent.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Nov 26, 2016.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    And how old was Sonny when he beat Wepner?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,797
    46,503
    Feb 11, 2005
    Ahh... the old "bully argument"... I suppose one needs merely to puff out one's chest and stomp his feet to show that bully?

    And what exactly would Marciano done against Clay/Ali? And by the way, those who attended to Liston after the Clay fight attested to his injuries.
     
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    If everyone has trouble reading a book, the problem is probably the author.
     
  4. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    He was pretty old, 40 at least.
    He gave Wepner a beating of course, and had he been in his prime it would have been easy work.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Nope.
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    In anyone has trouble interpreting what fantasy means ,5th grade is going to be a toughie for them.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Anyone can be starched for the count if they carry on boxing long enough past their prime.That is a fact!
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    0/10[/QUOTE]
    You wouldn't have dreamed it would be necessary to point that out would you?
     
  9. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    In all honesty I understood what was meant by fantasy interview, but I thought I'd give you a chance to explain why made up quotes are worthy of a thread. Thought there might be something more to it.

    Start an idiotic thread and don't be surprised we all respond with our own idiocy.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    If you think the thread is idiotic why respond at all? Surely that would just make you an idiot?
    BTW. It's gone into 3 pages with 38 replies.
     
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,579
    Nov 24, 2005
    I thought there might be something more to it. I was unsure at first.
    Yes, I've already implied I might be an idiot in this thread and am not going to pretend otherwise.
    That was AFTER you'd implied fault with everyone who didn't "get it" as slow, or "hard work" as you put it.

    Intentionally or not this is a thread with a click-bait title. It was misleading and it misled me momentarily and obviously misled others more so. On first reading some people here obvious skimmed over the word "fantasy", which is easily done when they were enticed by the title and looking forward to the quote. The point you were obviously trying to make you've probably already made quite successfully in the other thread. You clearly felt it deserved it's own thread but most of the early responders thought they were getting something else.

    The fault, if it exists, lies both with the readers and the author. Preferably there's no reason to fault anyone.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    I was responding to this.

    "If everyone has trouble reading a book, the problem is probably the author".
    And not "everyone" had trouble .
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    This thread is a scam!
     
  14. Giacomino

    Giacomino Member Full Member

    326
    151
    Oct 15, 2016
    Yep, I'm afraid so.

    When you're in a hole, stop digging.
     
  15. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    It's been shown many of times over the years that this "fact" just isn't true.