Does Lomachenko hide a despicable glass chin?

You seem to be having difficulties understanding the respond and edit functions, Mr F.

Au contraire, each of responses I have provided to you so far has been in direct response to your preceding posts.

My very first response...

...would have been sufficiently clear to most 'scholars' and probably most nine-year-olds.


Clearly the gist of this was that chin checkers are not respected round these parts.
(In fact, they are generally despised and are objects of universal scorn).


That you did not grasp this immediately, throws the "scholar" part of your claim into some question.

However, in the interests of civility (and enlightenment) I continued explaining the mutual exclusivity of respected posters and chincheckers by every means short of drawing pictures for you.

And when you requested education on the matter, I provided it, in good faith.


You seem to have found or attributed some humour to the response.

This is ironic, given the utter silliness of your thread concept. If there was anything humorous here, it would be the premise of the OP. I believe if you check, you will notice that several other posters have attempted to point this out, but to little avail.

The only explanation that comes to mind is the possibility that you may yourself be a closet chinchecker and have therefore taken umbrage at my pointing out the fact that such critters are not accorded any respect on here.


I regret I can be of no further assistance to you in this matter, save perhaps one final restating of my original rejoinder.

Respected chincheckers do not exist on this forum, or anywhere else !

 

Lomachenko has a great chin, even if you can hit him, which is almost impossible...............the judges were angry that Walters quit, they wanted to cheat Lomachenko like they did Kovalev..............

 

No mathematical formula was posted.

It was a mathematical statement.

It simply reiterated what I had said earlier in very plain English, namely...

There are no respected chincheckers.

The terms respected and chincheckers are mutually exclusive.

Being a chinchecker rules out being respected and vice versa.

Just as there are no giant dwarves, no moderate extremists, no bright UKIP members, etc.

Given your inability to grasp this fairly simple concept, whether stated in plain English or in mathematical terms, the only conclusion is that you might be a bit dim. That is to say, slow of wit, perhaps mildly ******ed, as they used to say BPC (Before Political Correctness).

This is further evidenced by your apparent chinchecking tendencies. In addition to not being respected, chincheckers tend, in general, to be a rather dimwitted bunch.

A final piece of evidence is provided by the image of the boorish dunce who graces your avatar.

This is not necessarily to be scorned since the circumstances of those so afflicted are usually beyond their control (poor genes, inadequate education etc).

If the problem is merely one of education, this might be remedied by instruction.

If, as I fear, it is more deep-rooted, then I'm afraid your best option is to cheerfully accept your shortcomings with forbearance and dignity.

 

Pure steel chin

 

Good to see you back, auld friend! You're a class poster.

 

Nobody ever claimed it was, Mr. F.


If you go back and look, I stated the proposition both mathematically and in plain English :


Stated mathematically:

{ Respected posters } ∩ { Chincheckers } = Ø


Stated in plain English:

'There are no respected posters who are also chincheckers.'



Regardless of how it is stated, you don't seem up to the task of comprehending it.

You should probably give the whole matter a rest for now. You're just confusing yourself and giving yourself a headache.

Clearly, it's well beyond your grasp.

It would be a bit like you trying to explain the workings of a wheelbarrow to an ant.


Why don't you go and have a nice cup of tea !

 

How about ye, lad ?

All's well with you and yours, I hope !

 

It's all true all of the above Mr Fararge.
That you made a thread not long after about Walters having a glass heart showed you to be a jolly good sport nonetheless lol

 

Temper, temper, Mr.F !

Try not to get your knickers in a knot.

We both know that my posts in this thread have been the very soul of clarity and lucidity, in the face of a rather preposterous OP.

That you found them incomprehensible is a testament to the muddled and disorganized state of your tiny mind.

Oh dear...

You have erred yet again, Mr. F

When an opinion is so clearly correct, so shining in its illumination, so universally shared, it takes on the essence of fact.

If I were to state that marmalade tastes better on your toast than diarrhetic rat $hit, some would claim this to be a mere opinion.

But so widely held an opinion is for all practical purposes, a fact.





I must add that I am deeply hurt by your slander regarding my sincerity in this thread so far.

I can assure you that I value candour and frankness very highly and would never post that which I did not hold to be true.