Last heavyweights of note w/ sub-70inch reaches?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Dec 4, 2016.


  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    62,172
    47,165
    Feb 11, 2005
    People do talk about how you have to get your chin in range to launch those short reach punches.

    There is a reason that our best heavyweights of the modern "athlete" era of the sport have been blessed with longer reaches or almost acrobatic footwork and upperbody movement.
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    True reach (long arms) has always been an advantage, and has always been the normal attribute of a good boxer.

    Wingspan "reach" measurement is almost meaningless.
     
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    Well yeah, it's boxing. If your chin is never in range, there's no fight.

    A guy with a short reach can close the distance on someone with big arms. once you go beyond the range of being on the end of a bigger mans punches, you can win that reach advantage.

    Of course it's not as simple as closing the distance. You also have to know what you're doing in there.
     
  4. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,587
    Jan 30, 2014
    Certainly interesting that other than Bejenaru, a 4-6 round club fighter who moved down to cruiserweight, we don't have any examples of heavyweights who began their careers in the past 24 years.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    We don't have many examples in the last 120 years, it seems.

    Even guys like Tony Galento and Tony Musto are listed as having reaches over 70 inches.
     
    reznick likes this.