If clinching was more harshly punished, how does HW history change?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Dec 11, 2016.


  1. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012

    He was happy to clinch throughout his career, in fact he welcomed clinches. Tyson didn't have the stamina of a Joe Frazier so I believe he did it to catch a bit of rest. He had the potential to be a great inside fighter but was far from being one. It was either laziness or stamina issues that prevented him being a great inside fighter, he did it in spurts so the skills were there.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    Pick a fight during he prime were you feel he was initiating clinches.
     
  3. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Smith for starters, Tyson was more than happy to clinch in that bout. I recall him clinching quite a bit in the Tillis fight as well. I'll have to watch his fights again to tell you more.
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    If you're going to ban it then why should it be allowed when hurt? If you're going to do something do it properly.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't want to ban clinching. I want it to be more frowned upon. You should clinch if you're hurt enough that you cant fight back and need to prevent the opponent from punching, that's common sense.

    Clinching should cost you the round imo. It is the most negative action in boxing. It isn't effective aggression, it isn't ring generalship, it isn't clean strikes and it isn't an offensive defence strategy. If clinching cost you the round we see more fighting on the inside or more skill on the outside. Either way we win as fans.

    There's a huge difference between not fighting a clinch and encouraging a clinch. Tyson often allowed himself to be clinched because as a smaller man you would expend a lot of energy wrestling your way out. That's exactly what made Wlad so successful.
     
    fists of fury likes this.
  6. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Wlad has a few more losses on his record due getting stopped or Dq'd . Ali doesn't carry on fighting as long and would of probably had better health in later life .
     
  7. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I still don't understand what you're trying to say. If you believe clinching is fouling then it should be punished the same as a foul. What's the point in allowing it if the only punishment is the loss of the round?
     
  8. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007


    Johnson relied upon clinching, hitting while holding and sometimes fouling. If you take that away from him, he lose more often.


    If clinching was somehow outlawed or factored in negatively to the scoring, we either see a lot more action and escape-oriented footwork.


    Wlad has other options. If clinching was a high negative his power and skills would be shown more, just like they were on his way up.


    Fighters would need to be in better shape in general.


    There is such a thing as a thumbless glove. Most fighters don't like them, but this glove might limit clinching a bit.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not really sure how to simplify it further.

    Clinching should be a defensive resort when hurt and should ensure you lose the round.
     
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    So you don't think it should be disallowed or punished?
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think the punishment should be losing the round.

    I'm sure I said that a few posts ago.
     
  12. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    So what if a fighter like Wlad is prepared to lose a few rounds so he can clinch and lean on his opponents to wear them out and stop them?
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    82,092
    22,176
    Sep 15, 2009
    Wouldn't work like that. An opponent would never have to fight out of the clinch because just being there means they win the round.
     
  14. Vic-

    Vic- New Member Full Member

    11
    2
    Dec 12, 2016
    Ruiz would need to look for another job...
     
  15. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    Clinching was ok whenever Ali did it...he was praised for his defensive savvy whenever he did it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2016
    yancey likes this.