Was Jack Dempsey The Dirtiest Heavyweight Champion?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by klompton2, Dec 20, 2016.


  1. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,405
    Feb 10, 2013

    And yet you, or rather the unbiased individual, can clearly see Dempsey hitting Sharkey low several times not just before the knockdown but also dozens of times throughout the fight. Methinks the lady doth protest too much... And, as the video states, if Sharkey really went down from the look hook (the one to the jaw) why was he grabbing his nuts on the canvas? Sorry apologists, bubble burst.

    The idea that an official defended his bias toward Dempsey by saying Sharkey wore his trunks high is ridiculous. Watch the film and tell me Sharkey's trunks are high much less any higher than Dempsey's. Look, your hero was a fouling, protected, hype job. Deal with it.
     
  2. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
    Dusted the prof is down for the count lol. Please dont run away, I still have comment on your "brilliant observation on the Brennan II fight. Gave Tunney the blueprint haha, too funny. Tunney was Tunney he knew what to do, he didnt need the John Ruiz of his time to show him the way. It's simple boxing 101, stick n move vs an aggressive puncher, basic, which you obviously dont know too much about. Spinning, spinning.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    OK, I just noticed the video was made/uploaded by Steve Compton, aka Klompton.

    So, Klompton, can you verify that the kidney blows were prohibited in ALL those fights you've shown ?
    Do you have the contracts or agreements to those fights, or failing that, the specific rules in which they were even probably fought under, and/or the regular rules of the local commissions (if applicable) at that time ?
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,524
    Apr 26, 2015
    Cherrypicker Crapton strikes again. Can anyone tell me why in his years on these boards he never wrote that the physician assigned to the bout found no evidence or injury from a foul blow?

    Can anyone tell me why he never wrote that many accounts state Sharkey wore his trunks high ("Sharkeys old trick").

    Why did Krapton never state that many watching the film of the bout did not see those three punches as low.

    The reason? He is a CHERRYPICKER. He chooses only the side of the story that helps his predetermined opinion.
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,405
    Feb 10, 2013
    So just to be clear you cannot see any low punches? Even the referee admitted that the right just preceding the hook to the jaw was low. The ref then went on to saw that the punch was that really hurt Sharkey was a left hook to the stomach immediately after the low right. The problem is that there was no left hook to the stomach before the low right hand. The referee was on the opposite side of Dempsey's left and to him you can see how he might think there was a left hook to the body but the film clearly shows there wasnt one. So essentially, if the referee admits that the last right hand was low and thinks that Sharkey was hurt to the body by a non existent left hook to the body, then hes admitting that it was the foul that did Sharkey in. One of the official judges also claimed the punch was a foul (meaning two of the three officials saw the foul that hurt Sharkey) and the instance was controversial enough to cause New York to rewrite their low blow rules. So dont preach to me about cherry picking. But Im sure you can also find excuses for why Dempsey should have been allowed to hover over his fallen opponents, rabbit punch them, hit them after the bell, etc. Thats the very definition of an apologist.
     
  6. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
     
  7. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
    Haha what a reply, o wise you must know there is no film on Greb, so that cant be done, but that has given me an idea for a new thread on Greb's foul tactics, cos there are plenty of examples in the reports and articles of the times and by people who fought and saw him.
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    An interesting sidelight development is a last minute question as to whether Dempsey will be permitted to use the rabbit punch.
    Montana's boxing law makes no provisions as to barred blows, although regulations in all Montana's clubs have in the past barred the rabbit, kidney and pivot punches. Eddie Kane, Gibbons' manager, has declared the champion may use any blow above the belt. Kane said "Dempsey can't hit Gibbons with a glove factory, let him use the rabbit punches or any blow he wants to employ. Gibbons won't be there when Dempsey socks, that's all. We're not worring about Dempsey's rabbit punch".
     
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,626
    Mar 17, 2010
    I think this is the alternate view people are alluding to:

    This content is protected
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,557
    Nov 24, 2005
    I have a feeling kidney punches and rabbit punches were barred in New York though, despite what some of the American press claimed after the Louis-Schmeling fight in 1938.
    Whether the rules could have been waivered for individual championship fights I don't know, but I doubt it.
     
  11. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012


    In hovering, them were the rules of the day, good sir, rabbit punching, hitting after the bell name one fighter who didnt indulge every now and then unlike Greb who did it all the time. You forgot to mention Benny Leonard. Prof, you seem to not know that there are 4 sides to a ring, and each side gets a different view, a punch that looks low on one side doesnt look low on the other side. Leonard said he saw the blow, he apparently was mistaken, all you have to do is view the effects of the blow, especially when Sharkey is dragged to his corner. Sharkey was involved in a low blow incident himself and therein lies the difference. in case you missed it
    This content is protected
     
  12. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
    The prof knows he is not gonna answer cos it doesnt fit his version of things. Watch SRR, the kidney punch was one of his favorites
     
  13. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,405
    Feb 10, 2013
    If you can put together a film as long as I did highlighting Dempsey's liberal use of fouls for Jack Sharkey then do it. I could have easily made my film twice as long. It just gets boring after a while hammering over and over and over how stupid you are.
     
  14. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,405
    Feb 10, 2013
    Unfortunately for your sad little comment I already did answer this post and made special mention of Robinsons kidney punch, glad you agree with me :pancarta:
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,334
    Jun 29, 2007
    You could say the same for Jack Johnson, hitting and holding, hitting on the break, pinching his opponents biceps, going low in many fights and being DQ'd for doing it.



    Dirtiest heavies:

    Godfrey
    Golota
    Sharkey
    Dempsey
    Johnson
    Marciano
    Liston

    You could add Holyfield and Tyson on the list too. Tyson with his elbows, and Holyfield with the head butts.

    Lennox Lewis could bend the rules at times too.