Wladimir Klitschko vs Riddick Bowe

whose claim to fame to outgasing a 43 year old he was losing to. why is a KO of this clown worth braggin about?

whilst this is Wlads best win probably, Povs claim to fame is going life and death with Huck, and stopping a journeyman.

whose best win is over 50 year old McCall. give me strength...

thompson the guy who couldnt contend when prime. lordydordy.

waiting for the unfit guy to gass, then clubbing the helpless guy out. great evidence, not.

arguably wlads best win, chaggy was a good amateur and as a pro capable of narrowly beating some of the weakest champs in history. Sadly for YOU, NOT A KO.

SO thats ZERO evidence form you so far.

YOU are chosing to shift to a different argument now, yes?

ok but you must make a fresh post for it after admitting defeat here. Dont try and run away from it! Just admit you lost.

You went on your mouthfoam about dino for some reason after that, which I'll completely ignore since Dino is irrelevant to you losing this argument.

 

Specious-Arguments-R-US ^

 

you chose to run away, ok. again, i would add.

noted by all.

 

Nope. Pointed out that your arguments are c rap.

There's a difference

 

For example, wtf does this even MEAN with relation to Thompson's durability:

"thompson the guy who couldnt contend when prime. lordydordy."

WTF? Are you huffing paint?

 

first of all Herol, you invented the run away on this forum.

second of all, the only thing noted by all is you have a extremely warped view of all things Klit and Joe Cal.

That's why you put me on ignore, remember??

 

Oh riiiiiight. Herol's Kryptonite was Calzaghe's greatness. I forgot that he has a spastic attack if you even say "Joe" or "Zaggers" or "slappy" ...

 

why do refer to facts as huffing paint?

TT was clearly and blatantly not able to get a title shot in his prime, needing to gifted one in his mid to late 30s twice by K2 promotions.

 

mentioning calzaghe in a bowe wlad thread? why? oh I see, you decided to go back to running from the argument you lost again.

ok

 

he tries to hide it but if you look closely his left side starts twitching.

 

That's obviously when his spelling and grammar go out the window. Hm. Zaggers weighs heavily on Herol's mind, methinks.

 

says the guy who brought him up in order to run away from the argument he lost.

 

where have you pointed them out? quote them.

i shall give you a whole day to answer this time. back tomorrow.

 

1) Somebody "getting a shot" has fackall to do with their actual ability. Many boxers "get shots" precisely because they are beatable garbage. Your argument is fallacious.
2) Assuming for sh*ts and giggles that "getting a shot" WAS somehow an indicator of ability, the question then arises whether being a good boxer has a bearing on our current argument. That being, did Wlad punch hard? Alas, it has no bearing because one could have great ability and yet be glass chinned, a la Khan.

3) You have racked up a double fail here.

 

good luck getting the pee stains out