what if Foreman did not retire in 1977?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Combatesdeboxeo_, Dec 25, 2016.


  1. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    what happens?,
    i know that it is an eternal debate (foreman vs holmes )and it is divided but apart of holmes. how do you see the career of big george in this space of time?(1977-1985?)
    remember some of the guys of that time.

    Lorenzo Zanon
    Ossie ocassio
    Trevor berbick
    Alfredo evangelista
    Leon Spinks
    Michael Dokes
    Mike Weaver
    Gerry Cooney
    Earnie Shavers
    Ken Norton
    John Tate
    James tillis
    Carl williams
    Witherspoon
    Pinklon thomas
    Reinaldo snipes
    etc
     
  2. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,517
    80,742
    Aug 21, 2012
    He would have been worn down and out before his comeback. IMHO the time off allowed him to mature mentally and spared him going through the grinder with his rock em sock em style. I quite enjoyed seeing Old Foreman use his head to win fights.
     
    GALVATRON likes this.
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    He gets beat by Holmes at some point between 77 and 1980.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  4. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    who would do it according to you?
     
  5. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,517
    80,742
    Aug 21, 2012
    No one fighter. He would have gotten worn out like most other fighters that like slugging it out through the accumulation of damage of fight after fight. Eventually he'd have looked old and beatable.
     
  6. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    i think that with his ponderous and powerful type style he would fine until he was 35 or so. foreman aged very well
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,568
    27,201
    Feb 15, 2006
    Hard to see anybody in the late 70s giving him a competitive fights to be honest.

    Norton was probably the best of the bunch.

    He could have run riot in the 80s as well.

    When he regained the lineal title in the 90s, he definitely did it the hard way.
     
    ZODIUS!!! likes this.
  8. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,517
    80,742
    Aug 21, 2012
    Aha, but there's the bone of contention.

    I reckon that he aged well because he had a long break from fighting, and when he came back he worked out a rather clever style that allowed him to be effective as an old geezer. His younger version was comparitively reckless and didn't mind taking a couple to land one.

    Again, on that list of yours he'd be favourite against pretty much all of them except maybe a Holmes. But run him through the entire gauntlet, and by the time he gets to Thomas and Snipes at the bottom of the list they would do pretty well against a worn-out version of Foreman.

    Hey, I could be wrong and Foreman the Slugger becomes Foreman the Boxer as his career evolved, it's happened before.
     
  9. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    yeah.. definitely the age will beat everybody finally, but lets say that he ages well, who would give him the hardest fight until around 1984-85? forget larry holmes.
     
  10. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    exactly
     
  11. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    The best of the late 70's was Holmes.....the man who beat Norton. At that time Holmes showed both the jab, movement and boxing ability to beat Foreman. Since 15 round bouts were the status quo at that time and assuming a title fight Holmes would stop Foreman late.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  12. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    someone did not read that foreman vs holmes is not the topic but ok...

    if ali could not outbox foreman holmes definitely could not, ali had better chin than holmes so holmes is not capable to take the damage that ali took vs foreman. added holmes traded fire several times when he got mad, Foreman was much better finisher than shavers ,better overall with a much better chin ,he was bigger,stronger and got a great heavy jab himself
     
  13. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    You don't know what you're talking about.

    Ali fought Foreman past his prime. Holmes of the late 70's is Prime Holmes. Larry would control the pace, take Foreman into the later rounds and then stop him.

    Foreman post Ali fought in a different style vs pre Ali. Post Ali he had a new trainer, Gil Clancy, who slowed down his pace. Pre Ali Foreman went all out early which was great when he dominated but did not allow him to do well longer distance. This is what hurt him vs Ali.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  14. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,298
    26,449
    Jun 26, 2009
    By your logic, if Ali could not outbox Foreman then neither could Jimmy Young.

    Except that he did.

    I see Holmes pulling away to win a 15-round decision by a fairly comfortable margin. Nothing suggests that Foreman would not continue to have stamina problems if he had kept going at that time. He learned to relax on his 10-years-after comeback, but I don't think that light bulb would have come on immediately had he kept fighting immediately after Young.
     
  15. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    i know perfectly what i am talking about, even 74 ali had faster footwork than holmes, and was more durable
     
    Jamal Perkins likes this.