Tokyo Douglas vs Joe Frazier

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by baconmaker, Dec 28, 2016.


  1. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I agree although Tyson did seem to handle single big shots better. Tyson without a doubt would have folded in the FOTC and the TIM after taking such a drubbing.
     
  2. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    exactly the same thing that foreman would have done with tyson
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, the truly elite fighters are always going to bring more than single big shots, so that's only helpful against limited opposition.

    It's worth pointing out Joe Frazier was never beaten with a big single shot. In fact, far from it.
     
  4. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Plus people miss the fact that Tyson was hurt in the 2nd round against Holyfield in their first fight by one punch and was staggered against Bruno early on with a single shot.
     
    Combatesdeboxeo_ likes this.
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    Everyone's going to be hurt by single shots sometimes at heavyweight.
    Stunned, staggered, floored, wobbled, whatever, it will happen to everyone at the world class level.

    Frazier and Tyson both had great chins.
    But if we have to seperate them, Frazier proved himself the superior.
     
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I'm just pissing all over the myth that Tyson could only be hurt after a prolonged beating, it just isn't true......
     
  7. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    right
     
  8. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    I agree. Of course it's not true. There are a lot of myths.
    The myth that Buster Douglas was some sort of puncher has shown up on this thread. His power was average for a heavyweight "boxer type". If he was a bigger puncher than the likes of Ali or Holmes we would have seen him KOing more fighters and knocking them down.
     
  9. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    People just assume he was because he was quite a bit bigger than the pair. I've no doubt he could punch but he was not a big puncher in heavyweight terms tbh.
     
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    You don't think he was?
     
    Combatesdeboxeo_ likes this.
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    They can all punch.
    Douglas wasn't bigger than Ali anyway. You can see that if you watch their fights with Trevor Berbick.
     
  12. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    yes, he was
     
  13. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,140
    Nov 19, 2016
    exactly, today people think that being heavier adding mass makes you bigger... your frame is the same with added mass or without it. ali was a very big guy simply at 212 pounds he was faster and had more stamina so it worked for his style, he was skin, slim fibre and bone at 212
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,580
    Nov 24, 2005
    Ali was a big man, especially in the 1970s.
    He weighed 224 1/2 here against Lyle in 1975 and he looked in good shape. The man had a big strong physique.

    This content is protected
     
  15. ticar

    ticar Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,264
    764
    Dec 7, 2008
    236 lbs mercer looks stronger than ali against lyle