No AJ, beating Wlad will not make you a legend.

Better quality of opposition than both Dempsey and Johnson

 

Who were the great names of Tyson's 4/5 year reign?

What about Holmes's era?

 

Just named them for you, but you ignored my response for some reason.

 

Well it's a good thing you're arguing against positions I haven't taken. So let's try this again - who is Wlad's best win?

 

You didn't reply to me directly so I didn't see it. It says a lot that Peter, Byrd and Cruiserweight, Haye, are considered his best opponents. The truth is, Wlad is defined by his losses, not his wins.

 

beating prime wlad wasno big deal, so of course beating old wald isnt.

 

I guess one of Wlad's 20 punches thrown the entire fight could knock him out, yes. Unlikely, I'd say. Wlad is 40 - he has nothing new to show. He fights like a scared man.

 

What about them? I didn't mention them. I have nether down as all time greats.

 

I think Fury's 'skill's is based on the fact that he beat Wlad. The truth is, Wlad lost because Fury was his own size and could outjab a perennial jabber. He didn't really need that much skill, in honesty. He had the physical tools. And what does AJ have to do with what I have said?

 

Wladimir has never fought a cruserweight. All his opponents have been over 200 pounds. Was Ali also a cruserweight, because he started his career around 188 pounds? Povetkin is a four time gold medalist with a amazing amateur record avenging all his losses. Wladimir is defined by his wins against solid opponents like all champions.

 

Wladimir beat many people his size or outsized him. Tyson was not his first opponent his size. The reason you like to believe that is your hatred for the Klitschko's. Which is obvious.