Did Marvin Hagler dare to be great?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mandibular Fortitude, Jan 6, 2017.


Did Hagler dare prove to be great?

  1. Yes, you can prove to be great in 1 weight class

    90.3%
  2. No, you have to move up. Broner dared to be great. Hagler didn't

    5.8%
  3. Golovkin hater here, this one's got me stumped

    3.9%
  1. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    8,092
    10,552
    Jun 10, 2012
    True, fighters can stay in one weight to be great, it is more got to do with level of opposition. Also the willingness to secure legacy defining fights.
     
  2. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,353
    Mar 11, 2016
    Broner - 4 division "Champ"
    Guererro - 5 division "Champ"
    Ugh....

    With so many belts in a division, and conflicts between networks or promoters, or fighters straight up avoiding one belt holder for an easier opponent, has greatly ruined what it meant to be a multiple weight Champ.

    Unification and defending titles, IMO, are where it's at. I always hated when a fighter won a belt and didn't bother defending it. A champion (As opposed to a belt holder) should defend his title, and act like a champion. I've always been of the mind that, fighters make a belt worthy. A belt doesn't make a fighter worthy.
     
    Beouche and pincai like this.
  3. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,632
    4,127
    Feb 20, 2008
    Exactly how would beating Glass Jawed Badou Jack make a statement? Jack is awful.
     
  4. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,632
    4,127
    Feb 20, 2008
    What someone made 3 years ago has no bearing on what happens in 2017. I don't know why you keep posting this nonsense. Furthermore, Canelo just sold 250k PPV's and lost his promotional company a boatload of money. I can guarantee you K2 isn't losing money on GGG's fights. A 'cash cow' doesn't sell 250k PPV's or lose money on fights for his promoter.
     
  5. LANCE99

    LANCE99 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,556
    6,353
    Mar 11, 2016
    Even the Lemmy - 3G PPV, with "only" 150K buys, made everyone money. Very simple mined posters think the total # of PPV buys is the be all, end all, or a PPV success. Hell, a couple of Floyd's last PPV's sold way under the amount needed to make money, and ended up losing money.
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    What nonsense are you talking about and what boat load of money?
     
  7. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,632
    4,127
    Feb 20, 2008
    Fighter A making X amount of money against fighter B and C three or four years ago is irrelevant. It literally means nothing but you can't understand that.
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    Ooookayyy....

    The POINT is that every fighter who ever wanted to prove their WORTH has either taken the SMALLER PURSE or have compromised WEIGHT.
     
  9. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,632
    4,127
    Feb 20, 2008
    'Catch weight' fights are a disgrace and don't prove anything. Participating in one of those is not something to brag about. They cheapen the sport for one and are embarrassing. There are 18 damn divisions pick one and fight at the limit.
     
    littletickle likes this.
  10. RingKing75

    RingKing75 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,037
    5,152
    Dec 23, 2013
    Its threads like this that turn this forum into a rotting cesspool.
     
  11. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    Several ATGs have fought at catchweights.

    Its more embarrassing to be a 7 year champion and not have one marquee win than to meet someone at a catchweight within a weight division.
     
  12. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,273
    6,588
    Jan 22, 2009
    So Holmes, Echols and Eastman were better than Hart, Monroe, Seales, Briscoe, Watts, Hearns, Antuofermo, Minter amongst others? Stick to the supermiddles because you obviously know nothing of the middleweights.
     
    DoubleJab666 likes this.
  13. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,212
    16,274
    Dec 6, 2008
    He stayed at middle, no problem with that. But he's overrated because he didn't beat any great middleweights.
     
  14. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,635
    18,358
    Oct 7, 2006
    You are correct. Marvin Hagler did not dare to be great, he was very fortunate to have fought in an era and a weight class where other ATGs would move up to DARE to be great.
     
  15. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    30,212
    16,274
    Dec 6, 2008
    It wasn't a great middle division when Hagler was around. And Hagler chased welterweights too, those are the best fighters he fought, a lightweight too.