GGG vs Degale and Ward would be very close and competition fights. Even Canelo would be close as GGG is only 4-1. But why oh WHY are you so HIGH on this CEJ????/ CEJ is the hype job who has ONE good win on his resume and thats the untested Chudinov. He lost to BJS looking clueless the first 6 rounds. CEJ needs to beat someone, why not fight his countryman Andy Lee???????
Maybe because no title was one the line, in boxing history I've never seen a guy have a non title bout 1lb above his division and people called that jumping weight. In almost every state if no title is on the line 1lb is allowed don't understand why suddenly it's considered moving up a division when Canelo is involved
Golovkin himself has had two or three fights at 161+ I don't see those fools saying Canelo has been fighting at MW for years also say Golovkin has fought at Super-MW in the past.
Don't try to play smart Isal. You simply aren't. And he was clearly referencing 168. And your retort was to post how many KO's Canelo had at 147 and 154? Of course, you're too stubborn, insecure, and narcissistic to ever admit you were wrong.
Golovkin has had two or three fights at 161+ Kirk get's all "Casual Fan" on us when it comes to GGG-Canelo.
Lance, you're pathetic, you jumped into a convo you have NO IDEA what it was about, I posted the entire convo for you to read, and you're still a falkin dumbass about it. Again, that dude said Canelo's power was CLEARLY going down as he moved up, AND that it would go down at 168.
He deserved the win against BJS, if he had that his resume would be up there with the best @ 160 Nobody gave BJS the first 6 rounds, round 6 was a clear CEJ round, 3-4 were also very good rounds I gave 1 to CEJ and the other a draw, round 1-2 CEJ was just posturing and didn't do anything. His fault but he didn't look clueless. He is the goods and he will get his time soon enough. What was GGG doing @ 27yo He's nearly 35 and his resume is still considered poor
If you tried really, really, really, really hard to give CEJ as many rounds as you could, you could have him winning 7-5. But if you do the same with Saunders, you'd have him winning 10 or 11 rounds. Junior lost the fight and then punked out of the rematch, just like he punked out of the GGG fight, and just like he ducked Jacobs. And compare his resume to GGG's 7 years into their pro careers. Macklin, Proksa, Rosado, Ouma(not to mention he was scheduled to fight Pirog early 2012) would all be massive step up from CEJ's opposition. And while Eubank's been busy avoding serious challenges, Golovkin was busting his ass off to get Sturms, Barkers, Zbiks of the division inthe ring with him.
Even the haters had it 115-113ish scores and were claiming it a glorious win, you weren't even a member here then but I tell you only true nut jobs could make it BJS by 10-11 rounds CEJ has been pro 5 years, had no amateur record and is already moving up because no names will fight him.
Fixed it for you. I did score the fight 7-5, what I'm saying is if you try really, really, really hard to give Saunders as many rounds and push it ridicuolusly like you're doing for CEJ, you'd have to have him winning wide.
TBH I admit that the fight was close and that a BJS win isn't that bad of a decision (even if I didn't score it that way myself). Even 1 of the 3 judges had CEJ winning though, and clearly 7-5 to CEJ is much easier to score than 10-11 rounds to BJS