I don't call it arrogance, stupid not to put in a rematch clause yes, but not arrogant at all. Before the fight Indongo hadn't even ever beaten a top100 opponent as I recall. Clear case of a cherrypick gone horribly wrong.
I think it was a bit of both. Arrogance because they completely overlooked the African, and stupidity because what if Troya had suffer a freak injury like twisting of a knee or some ish like that and thus lose by "ko". You always have to put a rematch clause because you never know... This showed that Russian promoters are still new in this game
In a parallel universe where Bud ages faster than the rest of the world and and turns 45 in a few months, maybe. Nah, I'd favour a 45 year old Crawford over any version of Burns.
indongo vs crawford i see happening if indongo wins. but what is crawford going to do in the mean time ? there isnt any one really out there. moving up to 147 might not be a bad idea. broner gunna be moving up there you will still have that big money fight. and to challenge guys like danny garcia and manny pac would be great.
There is no rematch clause for Jacobs vs GGG, back in the day many big name fighters didn't include rematch clauses in their contracts. It's the way champions used to do it.
Theres no rematch clause in case The Miracle Man makes a miracle and beats GGG ?? Where did u see that? That seems crazy to me.
Damn !! In that case, if GGG gets beat he's done at MW. Nobody will fight him without a belt. He has to move up if he losses.