Average weight of top 10 HW fighters throughout history

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 14, 2017.


  1. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Whoa there, tiger. Makes perfect sense that substances that weren't even banned in boxing and were rife in other sports took until the 90's to get there. Boxing had too much honor, integrity, and tradition to latch on to them in the 60's, 70's, and 80's.
     
  2. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Wlad every time....
     
  3. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,369
    80,552
    Aug 21, 2012
    Me too. He had a lot of great fights before Steward perfected his jab n grab ;)
     
  4. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,651
    Dec 31, 2009
    I'd rather watch the career of butterbean! Lol
     
  5. juppity

    juppity Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,342
    4,348
    Dec 28, 2016
    Another reason is that before the 90's any hw over 6'4 and 230lbs had the stigma of being overweight ,
    fat or too musclebound and uncoordinated. Bowie , Lewis changed this and once this stigma had been
    broken like lifting weights the giant coordinated hw has now become the norm.
     
  6. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,651
    Dec 31, 2009
    This is correct. On reflection Big John Tate should have looked a very good prospect beating Kallie knotze after all he had skill, but at the time he was no bigger deal than a bunch of other guys.

    The interesting revelation we have in this thread is the significance of the extra weight becoming so functional after 1985.

    The discovery might not be Bowe and Lewis themselves, but what it was that made them so coordinated at that size?
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,808
    21,398
    Sep 15, 2009
    Another thing to consider is the prestige of the LHW title.

    For a long time it was seen as a stepping stone to HW, for almost everyone in the division.

    But then those men began competing exclusively in the LHW division and later the CW division.

    Leaving room in the rankings for those who couldn't make 175 or even 200.
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,267
    45,634
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is a joke, right?
     
    Rock0052 likes this.
  9. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Absolutely. If my tongue were any more in my cheek, it'd have gone through it
     
  10. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,096
    13,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    This wasn't adressed to me, but >I'll hazard an answer.

    From Wikipedia and some other sources I gathered that steroids started being used by the Soviet bloc in for example as weight lifting soon after steroids were invented. The US tagged along in the 50's.

    By the 1970's it seems to gave become wide spread in Olympic sports. Someone on this board quoted a low over boxer from the 70's, that said it was rife in the sport by then.

    Going by your numbers there was a pretty substantial jump in size 1967-1977 that tapered off a bit 1977-1987. But the size increase from 1967 to 1987 was still not all that much (13-14 lbs from memory). It was after 1987 that the average size among top HWs really shot up.

    That could be interpreted as that steroids didn't get really wide spread use until the late 80's onwards. Another interpretation is that the use of steroids was wide spread already in the 70's, but didn't have a major effect on average weight until weight and interval training became a more common feature.
     
  11. Heracles

    Heracles Debonair banned Full Member

    133
    53
    Jun 17, 2016
    From '67-'77, I just looked and it seems the height increase was a lot too so the weight increase most likely comes with bigger fighters in general. A guy that is 6'3 is going to weigh more than a guy who is 6'-6'1 at optimal fighting weight, in general. A bigger frame supports more weight. I like what you said in the last paragraph, I came to the same conclusion.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,096
    13,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    As you said, the weight increase could be down to height increase rather than increased bulk due to steroids. Height has increased since 1987 as well, of course, but I don't know if it has increased at the same rate as weight.
     
  13. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    At the risk of beating a dead horse re: the importance of shortening the distance of fights, 1987 was also the last year a 15 round title fight was fought at heavyweight.

    The shorter the fight, the less cardio is required to be successful. The less cardio required, the heavier your athletes will become.

    The same thing plays out in U.S. football, where 300 plus pounders are supported by a combination of PED's and only actually playing 5 minutes over the course of a game that takes over 3 hours to finish (There's only about 11 minutes of whistle to whistle football, players only play offense or defense, and most starters won't play special teams).
     
  14. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,096
    13,022
    Jan 4, 2008
    Average height in 1987 (the Ring champion and top 10 contenders) was 189,36 cm. In 2007 (only top 10 contenders, since there wasn't any Ring Champion) it was 193,4 cm. An increase of 4 cm, or about 1,5 inch. So that's about 7-8 lbs per cm, or 18-20 lbs per inch.

    What was the increase in average height between 1967 and 1977?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,808
    21,398
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think it is a combination of PED's and shorter distance.

    I don't know the average height of men and how that progressed.