Does size count even just a little bit?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mrkoolkevin, Feb 22, 2016.


  1. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,641
    Mar 17, 2010
    If you were living in the 30's you might use Willard as a precedent, and he won against Johnson in the 26th round. It's actually longest lasting HW lineal title fight since John L Sullivan's days I believe.

    Look at the sparring partners Louis used for the Carnera match. There were plenty of SHW boxers out there to choose from.

    It is interesting that the top trainers of the day weren't scouting those types.
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    Yup. They are all manufactured cyborgs now.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    No, Frazier would have been a better candidate.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Have been for an awful long time.
     
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Wlad didn't do bad against Jennings did he?
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    How do you know they weren't scouting those types?
     
  7. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    We know why that is. The right drugs had not been discovered yet. That is the short answer.

    It is my hunch that boxing was a sport where a giant was compromised or prevented from reaching a physical potential under traditional methods where as smaller men were able to easier meet their full physical boxing potential at a natural optimal weight.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,676
    7,669
    Dec 31, 2009
    The bigger they are the less boxing you see. A lot of artificially enhanced giants wearing the other down. Holding.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    Holding is the issue. Nothing else.

    Chisora vs Whyte had no holding and that was a foty contender.
     
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Where are you going with this?
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    I don't know, you mentioned someone Byrd didn't do bad against, I mentioned someone Wlad didn't do bad against.
     
  12. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    You brought Wlad and Marciano into the discussion, what's that got to do with Holmes/Spinks?
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,234
    Sep 15, 2009
    You was on about beating Father Time, Wlad was the first past prime champ I could think of. Rocky was the first sub 200 HW I thought of, well second to Dempsey but I pick Dempsey prime for prime over Wlad anyways.

    Point being that normally a fighter would have to extremely past his best to not be favoured over someone he's so much bigger than. In the previous fight Holmes was 50 pounds heavier than Spinks so being past his best is still a huge obstacle to overcome.
     
  14. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012

    Better question to answer, who do you believe would win in the Wlad of the Fury fight and the Spinks of the Holmes fight?
     
  15. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    50 pounds heavier? Where do you get that from?