Deontay Wilder vs Gerald Washington (first top #20 opponent in over 2 years) who wins?

There is very little point in dealing with certain posters around here, that lad being one of them. There are a ton of people on here who are very quick to criticize someone like GGG's resume in every single thread about him, but have zero issues finding reasons to defend someone like Wilder. I wonder why this could be...

 

He was only 2 years older than the Stiverne that Wilder beat. I'd call you a boxrec warrrior as you barely seen any full boxing match in your life, but you're not even capable of that.

Stiverne's back foot counter punching style was only wrong for face first plodders with zero skills like Arreola. Peter actually had a jab, could move his upper body a little and had better punch variety. He was better than any versions of Stiverne or Arreola.

 

You simply don't understand boxing from a technical perspective. Peter had no foot work . None. At least Arroela knew how to position himself within range before throwing shots. Peter took wild swings and hoped for the best.
No objective fan believes Peter would have done better than Arrolea. That style all wrong for a sharp counter puncher. You are to wrapped up in fangasam to admit it.
And the version of Peter that Vitali fought was truly the worst that ever stepped inside the ring. Looking at him was an absolute farce. You probably never saw that fight either

 

Arreola better than Peters? What is happening here?

 

They were both useless bums. How is Peter any better?

 

I think Wilder will lose against his 7th cherry picked opponent.

 

Arreola knew ****, he was the textbook version of a face first plodder. Peter knew how to use his jab, double it up and even triple it up sometimes to get inside. He only took wild swings against Wlad because he couldn't find home for a jab or couldn't keep up with his movement.

Only an idiotic hater like you would believe a prime Peter would've been easier than Arreola, and only an idiot like you would call Stiverne a "sharp counter puncher". I've seen Vitali/Peter more than once, enough to know that it was no more of a farce than a future titlist getting his head boxed off by a 41 year old shot to **** Austin who was a bum even in his prime according to you for 10 rounds.

 

LOL so much hate for Wilder , according to the poll its 50/50

 

dont hate the player hate the game . boxing lets wilder get away with this . belts are meaningless. wilder would be fighting the same guys with or with out the belt. having it must earn you a little extra money idk . but belts are useless.

 

hes so flawed

hes been carefully matched

gallo has enough skills to trouble Wilder

i would not be surprised he pulls it off

 

I already wrote it :
If I have to be honest this seems like the hardest oponent for Wilder so far. He has the size and the power to hurt him for sure. We've seen Wilder being hurt before by Molina. So I would say this is way way better than his previous fights. Washington is decent but I think if Wilder let him get some rounds like he did in his previous fights against Molina , Arreola , Szpillka etc. , Wilder could be in trouble. Washington needs just one shot and it could be over. So if Wilder wants to win either he has to make a superb performance in each round or KO him early , cause the longer the fight goes , the bigger will be the chance for Washington to land a nice one. On the other hand there is a different point of view: the lack of stamina of Washington - he looks like a bodybuilder and this muscles are slowing him and if you checked his previous fights he has lack of stamina and footwork at some points. So I would give 15 % chance for Washington.

BUT the forum is just showing that there are a lot of trolls. That's what I mean: 18 people just casted their vote for Washington. How many of them would actually bet money on it? None. Wilder is matched pretty carefully so...

 

Peter used a decent jab in one single fight. And that was against a bloated up old middle weight who beat him first time out and got robbed of the decision.
A jab isn't beating Stiverne , especially the Vitali version who looked like a drunk scrapper. Vitali , Chambers and Helenius all easily beat him by drawing him forward. There was nothing to him. No skills. Slow. Plodding and predictable. Stiverne walks him onto bombs all night
MaCline who took the fight on short notice almost stopped Peter in the second round and lost a close dec. Arrolea demolished MaCline.
You're simply arguing for Peter for no other reason because Peter favours the fighter you like and Arroela favours Wilder. youre a silly fanboi who plays sides and dksab. You've been dealt with here in one sided fashion

 

Typical Dino, looking for a way out after getting his ass spanked claiming a moral victory.

Peter also showed a decent jab against McCline to come back from the KDs and win the fight, which would've been more than enough to beat Stiverne who beat the faded Arreola after a bloated up LHW who barely had %10 of the skills of Toney did the same to become a titlist. Now that's a farce and a joke.

I'm simply arguing for Peter because he was simply better than Stiverne in his time. You're the agenda driven moron here. If him and Stiverne swapped places you'd be insulting Stiverne in every possible way and calling him a useless fat bum. You're always driven by your idiotic, sick hatred. You never have any valid opinions whatsoever.

And even the fact that you arguing Helenius beat the shot Peter easily makes what we already know once again, that YDKSAB.

 

Wilder UD.

 

stiverne hasn't one decent win to his name. duhaupas actually has a better resume.