Poll: Where do you stand on PEDs in boxing ?

In an ideal world, I'd want lifetime bans. However, given the prevalence of PEDs (undoubtedly many boxers are getting away with it), the 2 year ban is fairer for first time offenders.

 

Dont buy into "everyone is on juicing" theory

But seems the majority are

Golovkin's gonna be coming in clean against probably the second best fighter in the division who's coming in juiced out his eye balls

Complete BS like that needs to be wiped out

And it seems the only way that can happen is either year round random VADA testing, or letting guys away with it

Who's to say VADA remains legit? Flash enough cash their way and im sure they'll turn a blind eye at some point

Its taken me a long time to come to this stance, but the only way is let people take drugs

 

This poll is doomed!

 

2 year ban, like Cheatapova, although she seems to have got off lightly, shes back on her PEDs and playing this month I think.

why hasnrt PEDvetkin been banned yet? whats going on there?

 

1 year ban for 1st time offenders. 2nd time offenders banned from the sport and their records stripped.

 

Its not that simple

Pacquiao got away with it his entire career

Jacobs is getting away with it against Golovkin

There are millions of examples where cheats are allowed off Scot free

The only way to level the playing field is to have them legalized and available to everyone

 

I'll never be in favor for legal PED use in sports or boxing.

 

Small bans for first offenders. Not every PED is created equal, therefore not every penalty should be the same. Also, not every thing on the banned list is a performance enhancer, such as diuretics. We have no way of knowing if they're cutting weight or flushing PED's. Can't assume the latter, so a small ban will suffice.

 

No.

There are better drugs and worse drugs. People with stinking rich backers will be on rocket fuel while the common grunt starting out is gonna have to shoot up horse steroids.

Also, some of these substances have horrible side effects. I don't want to see a guy on some god-awful cocktail of juice go on a 10 fight rampage and retire with heart failure or what have you. There's always a dude pushing the boundaries. If steroids are OK, then why not PCP?

 

Me neither. But id rather that than an unlevel playing field

 

Well that would sure make things interesting

 

A single independent commission/organization in place to perform all testing. Yes, corruption can exist, but you need a single body with standards that apply across the board with regards to the list of banned substances, and the types of testing to be performed. There needs to be random testing conducted both between fights, and during training camps. All this comes at a cost, but it needs to be done. Offences /penalties should be weighted based on the substance that is detected....a two year ban for foolishly taking a banned antihistamine to relieve allergies, should not carry the same penalty as injecting synthetic testosterone strictly for the sole purpose of performance enhancement. For first time offences of real PEDs that can affect athletic performance, a one year ban. Life for a second offence.

 

I think it should be less black and white. If you're a Russian fighter who took meldonium in some supplement, it's not like getting a shot of testosterone.

 

I am all for athletes using bioidentical, exogenous hormones UNDER DOCTOR SUPERVISION AND WITHIN NORMAL RANGES. I think this would help recovery, reduce injury, improve health and extend the length of careers.

Prime example being Bernard Hopkins. Do some you really think he would be competitive until 48 without TRT?