Yes Spence will get kell after his first defeat when he's took a bit of a beaten and his confidence dented, I beleive spence is just the better fighter anyway
who ? maidana ? is khans best win better than kels? I say no, Maidana v porter would be a hell of a fight but i'd pick porter to take it.Not that all that matters but khans resume is vastly overrated ... alexander - just been beat by porter had already lost before then too and cant punch algieri - poor footwork cant punch and hasnt beaten anyone of note. Claim to fame came from beating provodnikov in a fight i felt he lost canelo - He lost Garcia - he lost peterson - he lost zab judah - old way past is best so when you go through his resume he lost half of these 'big fights'. Now ofcourse his resume is better than kells but his best win is arguably worse than kells... This he's beaten 'several names' is a myth and lets forget 'names' lets stick to are these fighters good. Algieri has a name in america but once again its because hes seen asa good opponent to come lose... if kell fought algieri now he'd get slated. theres a different mentality in america to tunes ups/warm up fights. They are more willing to accept them and because america is seen as the 'home' of boxing generally most people across the world have heard of these 'tune ups' where as if you take a tune up in britain its slated. If brook now gave up his title and took a tune up after an injury he'd get slated. If amir did the same it'd be fine, which h is going to do. He has about 6 tune ups then takes a tough fight and will lose
Forgot my user name lofl I remember it Kingkhan2011 You had one of the best ever interment meltdowns Showing how fragile your mental state is Oh it was a great night that
Forgot my user name lofl I remember it Kingkhan2011 You had one of the best ever interment meltdowns Showing how fragile your mental state is Oh it was a great night that Many pros And commentary Press had it us for brook billy Love how you little brooks achievements whilst telling us all what a world beater Ricky is Your delusional but not quite khan level
Billy name theses name and there relevance your talking utter shyte here And it was a clear win for brook as the above poster stated Wow your verging khans level and I only scrolled down one post ***** me
No that wasn't it haha, even this account is older than 2011 My first account I stopped using in probaby 2008ish
how these khan fanboys can say anything about Brook amazes me.. Khan is the biggest joke in World boxing.. a laughing stock and the butt of all jokes.. His ducking of Brook is the most cowardly duck Ive ever seen
Well said billy. I disagree with your thoughts on how a khan - brook fight would go but it's undeniable that khan has the better resume. He has the best of the last decade bar froch. Even the "cherry picked" opponents are better than all of brooks opposition bar porter and ggg. Algieri/diaz and maybe even collazo are better than Jones, gavin and bizier. I think khan would outbox brook for 4-8 rounds and get stopped though.
billy nelson doesn't have a clue about boxing. and he's biased cause hes pally with Amir. If he seriously thinks Khan beats Brook then it's no wonder no top fighters wanna train with him
Ricky burns? His win over Martinez is better than any of brooks except porter. Martinez > Jones, Bizier, Gavin, senhenko
Defo not proven himself. Win over Porter was v.close. GGG fight was a joke. Padded record overall. Spence beats him easily if they meet
What fight were you watching? No chance Brook beat Porter easily and it's the only name he has beaten
like how you put except porter you missed out stepping up to face the monster if your gran had a c o c k she would be your granddad fhooking numpty
Read that Brook might replace Kirkland against Cotto at a latter date..................don't know if it's true, but Brook would probably beat Cotto..............fight in UK would do very well............