Welterweights. Past vs Modern

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Eastpaw, Jan 7, 2017.


Past or modern

  1. Past

    15 vote(s)
    68.2%
  2. Modern

    7 vote(s)
    31.8%
  1. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
    I saw a thread done on this topic with the heavyweight weight division so let's try the welterweight division. Amongst other divisions, the welterweight division has been one of the deepest historically, you can argue that it's just as deep or even deeper than both the middleweight and the heavyweight division in terms of a historical aspect. Looking at fights like these, what group of boxers would you favor, past or present?

    H2H:

    Sugar Ray Robinson vs Floyd Joy

    Emilie Griffith vs Felix Trinidad

    Henry Armstrong vs Manny Pacquiao

    Kid Gavilan vs Oscar De La Hoya

    Fritzie Zivic vs Terry Norris

    Jose Napoles vs Simon Brown

    Barney Ross vs Antonio Margarito

    Etc.
     
  2. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Welterweights have to be the same size, so the same basic body type. That makes "progress" harder to be certain about than hw's, where the body types have clearly grown considerably.

    I think some of the old greats like Hearns would have a great chance against the best of today.
     
    Last edited: Jan 7, 2017
  3. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    40,339
    3,430
    Dec 11, 2009
    Yes I understand what you are saying. I was trying to explain this to a poster who didnt get it today with regards to MWs. Many during Haglers reign were not (not all) around 6ft like many were during Hopkins reign.
    SR Leonard I think would do well also as he was a big WW also
     
    andrewa1 likes this.
  4. DoubleJab666

    DoubleJab666 Dot, dot, dot... Full Member

    11,843
    15,620
    Nov 9, 2015
    Somewhere else I have read it stated the talent pool is much greater now than in the past for reasons of population growth and the broadening opportunity to box in countries where in the past the pathway to elite level either did not exist or was not as clear as now. Which on the surface sounds reasonable until you scratch underneath it.

    If you take the modern era in isolation and then compare it to the countless other eras throughout the ages of boxing then the modern talent pool is much less than the combined talent pools of all the previous generations. The numbers game actually counts against those active today, and this is especially relevant to the divisions other than Heavyweight, which obviously benefits modern fighters due to the general trend which has seen them become taller and heavier.

    With regards to Welterweights, it's simply too much to ask the modern era to produce as much boxing talent as all the previous eras combined and, therefore, the past eras will have within them the greater talent overall...
     
    Pimp C, drenlou and pincai like this.
  5. andrewa1

    andrewa1 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    7,005
    2,071
    Apr 8, 2013
    Your thinking of talent pool wrong, that it's just number of people in a sport. Even there, what makes you think there are not more fighters now. I've seen boxrec data that says otherwise.

    But moreover, many of the tangible sports were records are broken routinely do have fewer participants. But those records are broken because the OVERALL talent pool is bigger. IE, there are more people in the world and more people that have access to get into the sport. The people with particularly advantageous body types then self select about getting in or are sought out or otherwise pushed or recruited into the sport.
     
  6. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
    Hearns would rule today's welterweight division if he was currently fighting
     
  7. Cap10Kirk

    Cap10Kirk Active Member Full Member

    702
    127
    Jan 20, 2015
    Ray Robinson started as a welterweight during the era of same day weigh-ins. Damn...
     
  8. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
  9. miniq

    miniq FURY COMETH 2026 Full Member

    48,674
    28,742
    Oct 23, 2011
    Margarito was overrated. Mosley put him in his place.

    Floyd & Pac weren't really true welterweights...just the weight they finished their careers at.

    Errol Spence, Brook & Thurman are examples of true Welters.

    If Floyd & Pacquiao were true welters they'd hang with ease with true welters of the past.
     
    Staminakills likes this.
  10. SOUTHERMOST

    SOUTHERMOST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,957
    217
    Oct 24, 2006
    Most the welters now are middle after they boil them and allow to rehydrate 10 or 15 lbs next day. See if they could make the weight same day.
     
    Rock0052 and Eastpaw like this.
  11. Eastpaw

    Eastpaw Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,005
    163
    Apr 12, 2015
  12. lewis gassed

    lewis gassed The Bronze Dosser Full Member

    25,429
    19,509
    Nov 24, 2013
    SRR-Berto would have been a hell of a fight.
     
  13. Willie Maeket

    Willie Maeket "40 Acres and Mule" -General William T. Sherman Full Member

    13,898
    8,374
    Jun 22, 2015
    I know he's not a welter, yet, but...

    Paul Williams vs Robert Easter Jr.
     
  14. pincai

    pincai The Indonesian Thin Man Full Member

    8,092
    10,552
    Jun 10, 2012
    Nutrition and technic has evolved. Berto would have schooled sugar. Too big too fast too evolved.
     
    lewis gassed, Loudon and Staminakills like this.
  15. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    "Schooled" might be going a little too far, but point accepted
     
    pincai likes this.