How much of Mike tyson s potential did we see?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Fergy, Feb 12, 2017.


  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    I would say that its swings and roundabouts concerning his early success - yes he was prodigious , alone in fact at garnering a HW title fresh of high school (thin about that - would you want to face some of the baddest men on the planet after leaving school? come on!)

    But starting early probably cut his career short in that he maybe began to believe in his own legend when he should have been busy adding to it whislt keeping his feet on the ground. If he'd started later, maturing, he might have stayed at the top longer.

    The way things panned out, he didnt develop the maturity to handle a long career. Guy was still partly a child in his head when he was heading titlewise.
     
  2. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    551
    Feb 19, 2014
    It is ironic that Tyson has gone from being overrated to underrated. It is ironic that his stunning success as a knockout artist ultimately prevented him from further development as a fighter. There was never a plan B because it seemed that there would never be a need for one. The KO artist never became a warrior or a complete fighter. That being said, the Tyson that destroyed Berbick may have been one of the greatest fighters who ever lived.
     
  3. blackhercules

    blackhercules Active Member banned Full Member

    531
    167
    Nov 13, 2016
    Lol Tyson is the only fight who could destroy old Holmes and Spinks? I think you mean he is the only one who did. Tua, Foreman, Bowe, Lewis, Wlad and Vitali Klistcko would destroy old Holmes and blown up light heavweight Spinks too.

    Because Tyson fought in a era that was weak and one the belt young it means something? You think a 20 to 21 year old Foreman, Lewis, Wlad couldn't beat Berbick? You are out of your damn mind but clearly you are one of those Tyson fans who will always make excuses for him and try to act like whatever did was more impressive than it was.
     
  4. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,355
    41,275
    Apr 27, 2005
    Keep him out of jail, highly motivated and on the straight and narrow and he's going to hold his peak a bit longer, obviously.

    His style was never one for great longevity but he could have got a couple more good years out for sure.

    The flip side is he would have had some serious opposition heading his way in Holyfield, Bowe and Lewis.

    I believe he would have got past Douglas so Holyfield would loom almost immediately. Holyfield has a hard to pin sort of peak and prime. This fictional Tyson would have had a better chance at Holyfield and would be a massive favorite but Holyfield would be right in it. Would Holyfield come up with the same brilliant tactics that offset Tyson's offense so effectively? They would have been effective against any version of Tyson but Holyfield would have had a different trainer as well at that point. I'd favor Holyfield.

    So much would depend on the Holyfield results but i think Tyson would have been waning by the time Lewis really picked it up, certainly after he got with Steward and shored up. Bowe was a bit earlier and whether champ or looking to regain he and Tyson would have met with both prime. I think Tyson in near peak nick would beat Bowe.

    The real question for me is Holyfield. This would dictate his success and legacy. If he's still peak with no drama's and can't get past Holyfield he is going to take a big hit, and Holyfield is going to rocket. The way it stands he was obviously way past peak when they fought and many still believe the best Tyson could win. At any rate Tyson proponents can say he never beat prime Tyson.

    If Tyson can't get past Holyfield he's stuck. If he does he might cut a bit of a swathe for a few years.
     
    Fergy and Seamus like this.
  5. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,456
    10,439
    Jan 6, 2007
    He burned brightly, but quickly.

    He was King for a while, and made the ATG list by age 23.

    Which was better than most pugilists.
     
  6. Giacomino

    Giacomino Member Full Member

    326
    151
    Oct 15, 2016
    Given that his body at 12 was that of a (well-developed) 18 year old, I'd say he'd have been finished as an elite fighter at maybe 28 - when his physical age might have been mid 30's.

    If he'd kept his motivation and not squandered his complete package of physical gifts he'd perhaps be considered top 3 greatest heavyweights of all time.
     
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    28,176
    33,843
    Jan 8, 2017
    Think that's a big part of the problem with Mike , such a young age winning the titles and everything that went with it but still being immature in a lot of ways... Was a heck of a lot to take in. A more mature tyson at a older age may have not been drawn in to mess he was and would have stayed on the straight and narrow.
     
  8. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    28,176
    33,843
    Jan 8, 2017
    If tyson could have remained focused , still had a corner team that knew what they were doing, then I believe he could have beaten the likes of bowe, foreman, moorer no problem whatsoever. Lewis and holy field I'm really not sure. Both Lewis and holy seemed to get better as they aged so if a top shape, dedicated, focused tyson had met the two in early 90s then I think tyson could have won.
     
  9. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    If Tony Tucker didn't have a broken hand the bubble may have been burst before. If Biggs wasn't a recovering addict maybe he would have boxed Tyson's head off. If Trevor Berbick wasn't drugged maybe Tyson wouldn't have knocked him out. If Larry Holmes didn't get his arm stuck in the rope he would have survived the round and maybe he could have made a comeback. Lots of if's around Mike Tyson.....
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,877
    8,017
    Jul 17, 2009
    I think Tyson,up to the Michael Spinks bout,could n't have got much better than he actually was. What we would have seen was Tyson maintaining that peak a few years longer than he actually did had he kept Rooney and/or continued to practice what Cus D'Amato taught him.
     
  11. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    57,848
    76,495
    Aug 21, 2012
    Don't be a moron.
     
    GordonGarner65 likes this.
  12. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    57,848
    76,495
    Aug 21, 2012
    We saw Tyson get as good as he was ever going to get. Which is to say, pretty damn good.

    What he could have benefitted from was somebody to keep his nose clean, in the gym, and out of trouble.

    He was unquestionably a lot worse in his later career than in his prime, and he never regained that form.
     
    GordonGarner65 likes this.
  13. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    The Jinx would outfox Tua, Wlad and vits.
     
  14. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,026
    Sep 22, 2010
    I dont think he married into the family but Don was certainly his godfather for a while.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,355
    41,275
    Apr 27, 2005
    True, very true.
     
    BCS8 likes this.