Crawford or Lomachenko?

I ain't perfect alt. I've been wrong before alt, and I'll be wrong again. But when the tough gets going, I don't crawl under an alt, alt.

 

Lomachenko is far more skilled than Crawford, wo will only fight in his home town, with his personal judges, referee, boxing commission, etc.

 

whatever you say.

 

What you tryin to tell me that Russell is garbage? I don't understand.

 

No. I asked who did he beat because you said that Russell is better than anyone Crawford has fought.

 

Russell is better than anyone Crawford has fought..............

 

Lomachenko and it's not even close. It's like asking what's bigger, an elephant or a blue whale.

 

Crawford has a much more diverse skill set than LoMo.
He is a truly gifted specimen of an UNDEFEATED boxer.
LoMo has only 8 fights and a loss. He needs to pick up the pace and stop living off of hype.

 

Come on dude. You've got to give Crawford credit. He has skill, is exciting and hasn't ducked anyone. Also he's from Nebraska.... So you really can't say that he only fights at home.

 

I'll take the sexy gentleman with the flawless facial bone structure and piercing cerulean eyes.




























































































































(no homo)

 

Both fighters are Tremondously skilled warriors.

I'll leave it at that.

 

gonna go with loma I don't think anyone 140 and lower beats him. mikey Garcia would probs have the best shot. but even then I think loma would outbox him to a ud .

 

Stop ****'ing up the thread sissy!

 

Don't make me puncture you, bro!

 

When asked to elevate their skill in a fight one has and one hasn't bottom line.