I agree with this. Crawford has more dog in him than Loma does. He would get down and dirty in the trenches with Salido if need be to win.
Both are very good p4p level boxers. Personally I think Lomachenko is a little more skilled, but let's see if Crawford can prove me wrong!
Crawford imo is just more versatile. If he's orthodox and gets caught he can go southpaw. He can stalk or fight inside and he has a jab from both sides. And the power difference between the two is night and day. But Pimp it's jmo...
It's funny how 140 is all of a sudden "weak" after Crawford schooled your hero Postol. You would have thought Postol was the second coming of Roberto Duran the way some of you nut huggers were going on about him prior to the Crawford dismantling...
LOL I'm the joke? You are the one suddenly back tracking. Crawford IS an elite fighter but what you are praising him for doing resume wise Lomo has matched in 8 fights even with the loss which he was still a novice pro. IF Crawford had fought the level of opposition in his first 8 fights that Lomo did I've no doubt he'd have a loss to. In Crawfords first 12 fights he only fought 2 fighters with winning records and only stepped up in his 20th fight against Prescott. Again imo and the majority of people's opinion Lomo is the better more talented fighter, that is not taking anything away from Crawford.
I said all along that I was on the shelf regarding Crawford and that I rated Postol and would give props if Crawford won which he did easily. Having said that Postol has never been regarded as the second coming of Duran by anyone, just another lie by you and it doesn't take away that 135 and 140 are at their weakest they have been for some years. Now jog on you tit.
GTFOOH. You EE nut huggers were riding Postol tool like a near bankrupt rodeo cowboy up until the day after the Crawford dismantling. Stop with the BS...